[subject] [last name of the first listed author]
Free text:
''Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company v. Minnesota'', 134 U.S. 418 (1890). {{Template:Cases Stub}} '''Facts''': State established rates for the Railroads. State did not provide notice nor hold hearings. '''Issue''': Did the State overstep the bounds of due process? '''Holding''': Yes, the judiciary should decide if the rates were "reasonable." '''Dissent''' (Bradley): Practically overrules [[Munn v. Illinois]]. [[Category:Cases:Constitutional Law]]