Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company v. Minnesota
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company v. Minnesota, 134 U.S. 418 (1890).
|This is a case brief stub.|
|You can help by adding to it.|
Facts: State established rates for the Railroads. State did not provide notice nor hold hearings.
Issue: Did the State overstep the bounds of due process?
Holding: Yes, the judiciary should decide if the rates were "reasonable."
Dissent (Bradley): Practically overrules Munn v. Illinois.