United States v. Ross
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
|United States v. Ross|
|Court||Supreme Court of the United States|
|Date decided||June 1, 1982|
|Appealed from||DC Court of Appeals|
DC police officer were told a man named "Bandit" Ross was selling illegal drugs from his car northwest of Washington DC.
The informant told police that he had bought drugs from Ross, and there were more narcotics in Ross's Chevrolet Malibu car.With the information from the tipster, police found heroin in a closed paper bag in the trunk of Ross's car.
Was the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution against unreasonable searches and seizures violated?
Ross argued that even if police had reason to believe that he had narcotics in his car, the police lacked the authority to search the bag in his car's trunk.
The Supreme Court upheld Ross's conviction.
If police have the power to search an automobile, then the police also has the power to search anything within the automobile.