Schreiber v. Olan Mills

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Schreiber v. Olan Mills
Court Pennsylvania Superior Court
Citation 627 A.2d 806
Date decided July 12, 1993

Facts

  • Olan Mills, Inc. = "Olan Mills" = a national portrait photography company in the 1990s = Lifetouch Inc. acquired Olan Mills in 2011 = defendant
  • Olan Mills often relied on telemarketing
  • Schreiber = plaintiff
  • In November 1989, Schreiber lashed out against an Olan Mills telemarketer
  • Schreiber wrote a letter to Olan Mills stating that future telemarketing calls would be considered entry into a contract for listening services subject to a fee of $100/hour + additional fees
  • Olan Mills agent called Schreiber twice more without paying the requested fees

Procedural History

  • Schreiber sued for breach of contract to collect $479 in fees from Olan Mills
  • Olan Mills filed a demurrer ("So what?" motion) stating that no contract existed between the 2 parties.
  • Schreiber lost.

Issues

Must there be a meeting of the minds ensuring both parties assent to the same thing for a contract to be established?

Holding

Yes. To establish a contract, there must be a meeting of the minds such that the parties mutually assent to the same thing.

Judgment

Affirmed

Reasons

The court opined that the letter couldn't be a contract; instead, it qualified as a cease-and-desist letter.

Resources