Schreiber v. Olan Mills
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Schreiber v. Olan Mills | |
Court | Pennsylvania Superior Court |
---|---|
Citation | 627 A.2d 806 |
Date decided | July 12, 1993 |
Facts
- Olan Mills, Inc. = "Olan Mills" = a national portrait photography company in the 1990s = Lifetouch Inc. acquired Olan Mills in 2011 = defendant
- Olan Mills often relied on telemarketing
- Schreiber = plaintiff
- In November 1989, Schreiber lashed out against an Olan Mills telemarketer
- Schreiber wrote a letter to Olan Mills stating that future telemarketing calls would be considered entry into a contract for listening services subject to a fee of $100/hour + additional fees
- Olan Mills agent called Schreiber twice more without paying the requested fees
Procedural History
- Schreiber sued for breach of contract to collect $479 in fees from Olan Mills
- Olan Mills filed a demurrer ("So what?" motion) stating that no contract existed between the 2 parties.
- Schreiber lost.
Issues
Must there be a meeting of the minds ensuring both parties assent to the same thing for a contract to be established?
Holding
Yes. To establish a contract, there must be a meeting of the minds such that the parties mutually assent to the same thing.
Judgment
Affirmed
Reasons
The court opined that the letter couldn't be a contract; instead, it qualified as a cease-and-desist letter.