Hillesland v. Association (North Dakota)
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Hillesland v. Association (North Dakota) | |
Court | North Dakota Supreme Court |
---|---|
Citation | 407 N.W.2d 206 |
Date decided | May 28, 1987 |
Facts
- Federal Land Bank Association of Grand Forks = "Association" = defendant
- Mr. Hillesland = "Hillesland" = plaintiff = he was an employee of the Association for 30 years. He was CEO for 10 years.
- Through his position, Hillesland learned that the Westby couple, customers of the Association, wanted to sell their property to a 3rd party. In short, the son of Hillesland purchased the said property.
Procedural History
Hillesland sued the Association & bank for breach of contract & other claims.
Hillesland asserted that he had a contract for permanent employment to be terminated only for good cause.
Hillesland lost on summary judgment.Issues
Is a covenant of good faith & fair dealing implied in employment contracts?
Arguments
Hillesland argued that he wasn't an at-will employee.
Holding
No. There's no implied covenant of good faith & fair dealing in employment contracts.
Judgment
Affirmed
Reasons
Chief Justice Erickstad: Summary judgment is appropriate if the material facts aren't in dispute & the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
Rule
At-will employment has been codified (as of 1987) in North Dakota. Consequently, employment that isn't for a specified time period may be terminated in North Dakota upon a simple notice.
The employment laws in the European Union are very different in favor of employees.Resources