Hillesland v. Association (North Dakota)

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Hillesland v. Association (North Dakota)
Court North Dakota Supreme Court
Citation 407 N.W.2d 206
Date decided May 28, 1987

Facts

  • Federal Land Bank Association of Grand Forks = "Association" = defendant
  • Mr. Hillesland = "Hillesland" = plaintiff = he was an employee of the Association for 30 years. He was CEO for 10 years.
  • Through his position, Hillesland learned that the Westby couple, customers of the Association, wanted to sell their property to a 3rd party. In short, the son of Hillesland purchased the said property.
The directors of the Association (bank) fired Hillesland for the property transaction.

Procedural History

Hillesland sued the Association & bank for breach of contract & other claims.

Hillesland asserted that he had a contract for permanent employment to be terminated only for good cause.

Hillesland lost on summary judgment.

Issues

Is a covenant of good faith & fair dealing implied in employment contracts?

Arguments

Hillesland argued that he wasn't an at-will employee.

Holding

No. There's no implied covenant of good faith & fair dealing in employment contracts.

Judgment

Affirmed

Reasons

Chief Justice Erickstad: Summary judgment is appropriate if the material facts aren't in dispute & the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Rule

At-will employment has been codified (as of 1987) in North Dakota. Consequently, employment that isn't for a specified time period may be terminated in North Dakota upon a simple notice.

The employment laws in the European Union are very different in favor of employees.

Resources