Haslem v. Lockwood
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Haslem v. Lockwood | |
Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
---|---|
Citation | 37 Conn. 500 |
Date decided | 1871 |
Facts
- "Haslem" = a farm owner and employer = plaintiff
- In Stamford, Connecticut in April 1869, Haslem directed 2 employees to rake abandoned horse manure into heaps that had accumulated in a public street. His intention was to carry it away the next day.
- Lockwood, who had no knowledge of the Haslem’s actions, found the nicely-packed & ready heaps of manure & hauled them off to his own land.
- (Horse manure was valued for providing farm lands with nutrients.)
- Haslem demanded payment for the heaps of manure.
- Lockwood refused to pay up.
Procedural History
- Haslem filed a trover lawsuit against Lockwood.
- Lockwood won in the trial court.
- Lockwood won again in the Court of Common Pleas.
Issues
Does a person who adds value to abandoned property become its owner such that he may leave it for a reasonable time before returning to collect it?
Arguments
- Lockwood argued that he hauled away the manure heaps because they were abandoned.
- Haslem argued that the manure heaps were his personal property.
Holding
Yes; someone who adds value to abandoned property (by assembling the manure into heaps) acquires legal possession of it that can withstand his leaving it un-attended for a reasonable time (such as 1 day).
Judgment
Reversed
Resources