Congregation Kadimah Toras-Moshe v. DeLeo
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Congregation Kadimah Toras-Moshe v. DeLeo | |
Court | Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court |
---|---|
Citation | 405 Mass. 365; 540 N.E.2d 691 |
Date decided | July 11, 1989 |
Facts
A rabbi from Congregation Kadimah Toras-Moshe ("Congregation") visited the bed-ridden Mr. Schwam. During the visit, in the presence of witnesses, Schwam promise to bequeath $25,000 to the Congregation when he passed away. However, Schwam never created a will or put his promise in writing.
Procedural History
The Congregation sued DeLeo, the administrator of the Schwam estate in Massachusetts state court to enforce Schwam's oral promise.
A municipal court found that there was not enforceable promise.
The Massachusetts superior court also found in favor of DeLeo.Issues
Is an oral promise to a charity enforceable if there wasn't any consideration for it or deterimental reliance on it?
What if the promise to donate to a charity isn't in writing?Holding
No. An oral promise to a charity isn't enforceable if there wasn't any consideration for it or detrimental reliance on it.
Judgment
Affirmed.
Rule
Written promises to charities are enforceable even if there is no detrimental reliance on the promise.
Case Text Links