Beach v. Beach

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Beach v. Beach
Court Colorado Supreme Court
Citation 74 P.3d 1
Date decided June 30, 2003

Facts

  • This case is about a property dispute between a mother & her daughter.
  • The adult daughter ("Beach") had elderly parents.
  • The daughter offered her parents to build an addition to her house.
  • The parents built an in-law suite connected to the daughter's house.
  • The parents agreed that the daughter would acquire the added housing unit upon their passing.
  • The parents had a life-estate interest
  • The daughter had future-remainder interest
  • The father died.
  • The mother & daughter fell out.

Procedural History

  • The mother sued her daughter to partition her interest in the added house from the daughter's interest.
  • The mother lost.
  • The mother won in the appeals court.

Issues

May a life-estate interest in property be partitioned from a non-concurrent & successive remainder interest in that property?

Holding

No; a life-estate interest in property may not be partitioned from a non-concurrent & successive remainder interest in that property.

Judgment

Reversed

Reasons

Justice Mullarkey: <u>Concurrent ownership</u> is generally required for partition.

Rule

Without concurrent interests, there is no unity of possession to sever (partition).

Resources