Beach v. Beach
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Beach v. Beach | |
Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
---|---|
Citation | 74 P.3d 1 |
Date decided | June 30, 2003 |
Facts
- This case is about a property dispute between a mother & her daughter.
- The adult daughter ("Beach") had elderly parents.
- The daughter offered her parents to build an addition to her house.
- The parents built an in-law suite connected to the daughter's house.
- The parents agreed that the daughter would acquire the added housing unit upon their passing.
- The parents had a life-estate interest
- The daughter had future-remainder interest
- The father died.
- The mother & daughter fell out.
Procedural History
- The mother sued her daughter to partition her interest in the added house from the daughter's interest.
- The mother lost.
- The mother won in the appeals court.
Issues
May a life-estate interest in property be partitioned from a non-concurrent & successive remainder interest in that property?
Holding
No; a life-estate interest in property may not be partitioned from a non-concurrent & successive remainder interest in that property.
Judgment
Reversed
Reasons
Justice Mullarkey: <u>Concurrent ownership</u> is generally required for partition.
Rule
Without concurrent interests, there is no unity of possession to sever (partition).