Schreiber v. Olan Mills

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Revision as of 04:13, January 6, 2024 by DeRien (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Schreiber v. Olan Mills
Court Pennsylvania Superior Court
Citation 627 A.2d 806
Date decided July 12, 1993

Facts

  • Olan Mills, Inc. = "Olan Mills" = a national portrait photography company in the 1990s = Lifetouch Inc. acquired Olan Mills in 2011 = defendant
  • Olan Mills often relied on telemarketing
  • Schreiber = plaintiff
  • In November 1989, Schreiber lashed out against an Olan Mills telemarketer
  • Schreiber wrote a letter to Olan Mills stating that future telemarketing calls would be considered entry into a contract for listening services subject to a fee of $100/hour + additional fees
  • Olan Mills agent called Schreiber twice more without paying the requested fees

Procedural History

  • Schreiber sued for breach of contract to collect $479 in fees from Olan Mills
  • Olan Mills filed a demurrer ("So what?" motion) stating that no contract existed between the 2 parties.
  • Schreiber lost.

Issues

Must there be a meeting of the minds ensuring both parties assent to the same thing for a contract to be established?

Holding

Yes. To establish a contract, there must be a meeting of the minds such that the parties mutually assent to the same thing.

Judgment

Affirmed

Reasons

The court opined that the letter couldn't be a contract; instead, it qualified as a cease-and-desist letter.

Resources