Jones v. U.S.: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Facts''': Jones was supposed to be caring for a 10-month-old infant. Jones neglected to do so and the baby died.  
{{Infobox Case Brief
 
|subject=Criminal Law
Procedural History.: D was found guilty initially
|case_treatment=No
 
|facts=Jones was supposed to be caring for a 10-month-old infant. Jones neglected to do so and the baby died.
'''Issue''': can Jones be found liable?
|procedural_history=D was found guilty initially
 
|issues=can Jones be found liable?
'''Holding''': only if he was being paid to care for the infant.
|holding=Only if he was being paid to care for the infant.
 
|judgment=Reversed and remanded
'''Reasons''': legal duty for care must be found. There are 4 possible scenarios in which this legal duty can be found:
|reasons=Legal duty for care must be found. There are 4 possible scenarios in which this legal duty can be found:
# statute imposes duty
#statute imposes duty
# one stands on a certain status relationship to another
#one stands on a certain status relationship to another
# one has assumed a contractual duty to care for another
#one has assumed a contractual duty to care for another
# one has voluntarily assumed the care of another and so secluded the helpless person as to prevent others from rendering aid.
#one has voluntarily assumed the care of another and so secluded the helpless person as to prevent others from rendering aid.


Scenario #3 is the only possible one under which Jones could be found liable. If trial ct. finds that he was in a contract to care for the infant, then he is liable for its death.
Scenario #3 is the only possible one under which Jones could be found liable. If trial ct. finds that he was in a contract to care for the infant, then he is liable for its death.
 
|comments=Lower court must find out if there was a contract (written, oral, or implied) to care for the infant.
'''Judgment''': Reversed and remanded.
}}
 
'''Comments''': Lower ct. must find out if there was a contract (written, oral, or implied) tto care for the imfant.
[[Category:Cases:Criminal Law]]

Revision as of 18:47, February 22, 2022

Jones v. U.S.
Court
Citation
Date decided

Facts

Jones was supposed to be caring for a 10-month-old infant. Jones neglected to do so and the baby died.

Procedural History

D was found guilty initially

Issues

can Jones be found liable?

Holding

Only if he was being paid to care for the infant.

Judgment

Reversed and remanded

Reasons

Legal duty for care must be found. There are 4 possible scenarios in which this legal duty can be found:

  1. statute imposes duty
  2. one stands on a certain status relationship to another
  3. one has assumed a contractual duty to care for another
  4. one has voluntarily assumed the care of another and so secluded the helpless person as to prevent others from rendering aid.
Scenario #3 is the only possible one under which Jones could be found liable. If trial ct. finds that he was in a contract to care for the infant, then he is liable for its death.

Comments

Lower court must find out if there was a contract (written, oral, or implied) to care for the infant.