Day v. Sidley & Austin: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Lost Student (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief | court = | citation = | date = <!-- example: "April 3, 1974" --> | subject = Business Assoc...") |
Lost Student (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "|case_treatment=No " to "") |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox Case Brief | {{Infobox Case Brief | ||
| court | |court= | ||
| citation | |citation= | ||
| date | |date=April 3, 1974 | ||
| subject | |subject=Business Associations | ||
| appealed_from | |appealed_from= | ||
| | |overturned= | ||
| | |partially_overturned= | ||
| | |reaffirmed= | ||
| | |questioned= | ||
| | |criticized= | ||
| | |distinguished= | ||
| | |cited= | ||
| | |followed= | ||
| | |related= | ||
| | |facts=P belonged to D law firm as a partner, but not a member of the decision-making executive committee. P was sole chairperson of D.C. office of firm. Law firm announced a potential merger, and told all partners they would be in better or as good condition after the merger as before. All partners voted to approve merger. After approval, P found that he would lose position of sole chairman, felt humiliated, and resigned. | ||
| | |procedural_history= | ||
| | |issues=Did the law firm breach/owe a duty to P? | ||
| | |arguments= | ||
| | |holding=There was no breach of duty nor contract by D. | ||
|judgment= | |||
|reasons= | |||
|rule= | |||
|comments= | |||
|case_text_links= | |||
|Court_opinion_parts= | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 03:39, July 14, 2023
| Day v. Sidley & Austin | |
| Court | |
|---|---|
| Citation | |
| Date decided | April 3, 1974 |
Facts
P belonged to D law firm as a partner, but not a member of the decision-making executive committee. P was sole chairperson of D.C. office of firm. Law firm announced a potential merger, and told all partners they would be in better or as good condition after the merger as before. All partners voted to approve merger. After approval, P found that he would lose position of sole chairman, felt humiliated, and resigned.
Issues
Did the law firm breach/owe a duty to P?
Holding
There was no breach of duty nor contract by D.
