Day v. Sidley & Austin
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.Jump to navigationJump to search
|Day v. Sidley & Austin|
|Date decided||April 3, 1974|
P belonged to D law firm as a partner, but not a member of the decision-making executive committee. P was sole chairperson of D.C. office of firm. Law firm announced a potential merger, and told all partners they would be in better or as good condition after the merger as before. All partners voted to approve merger. After approval, P found that he would lose position of sole chairman, felt humiliated, and resigned.
Did the law firm breach/owe a duty to P?
There was no breach of duty nor contract by D.