Editing Cravath, Swaine & Moore

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 52: Line 52:


In 2015, Cravath, Swaine and Moore was the victim of what the company described as a "limited breach" of its computer network, which The New York Times connected to a 2016 court case against three Chinese hackers who had made more than $4 million from insider information about merger deals.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/27/business/dealbook/new-york-hacking-law-firms-insider-trading.html|title=3 Men Made Millions by Hacking Merger Lawyers, U.S. Says|last=Picker|first=Leslie|date=2016-12-27|newspaper=The New York Times|issn=0362-4331|access-date=2016-12-28}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cyber-insidertrading-idUSKBN14G1D5 |publisher=[[Reuters]] |title=U.S. accuses Chinese citizens of hacking law firms, insider trading |first=Nate |last=Raymond |date=December 28, 2016 |archive-date=December 28, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161228183507/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cyber-insidertrading-idUSKBN14G1D5 |quote=Prosecutors did not identify the two law firms, or five others they said the defendants targeted. But one matched the description of New York-based Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, which represented Pitney Bowes in its 2015 acquisition of Borderfree Inc, one of the mergers in question. The indictment said that by using a law firm employee's credentials, the defendants installed malware on the firm's servers to access emails from lawyers, including a partner responsible for the Pitney deal. Cravath declined to comment. In March, Cravath confirmed discovering a "limited breach" of its systems in 2015. |deadurl=yes |df= }}</ref>
In 2015, Cravath, Swaine and Moore was the victim of what the company described as a "limited breach" of its computer network, which The New York Times connected to a 2016 court case against three Chinese hackers who had made more than $4 million from insider information about merger deals.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/27/business/dealbook/new-york-hacking-law-firms-insider-trading.html|title=3 Men Made Millions by Hacking Merger Lawyers, U.S. Says|last=Picker|first=Leslie|date=2016-12-27|newspaper=The New York Times|issn=0362-4331|access-date=2016-12-28}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cyber-insidertrading-idUSKBN14G1D5 |publisher=[[Reuters]] |title=U.S. accuses Chinese citizens of hacking law firms, insider trading |first=Nate |last=Raymond |date=December 28, 2016 |archive-date=December 28, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161228183507/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cyber-insidertrading-idUSKBN14G1D5 |quote=Prosecutors did not identify the two law firms, or five others they said the defendants targeted. But one matched the description of New York-based Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, which represented Pitney Bowes in its 2015 acquisition of Borderfree Inc, one of the mergers in question. The indictment said that by using a law firm employee's credentials, the defendants installed malware on the firm's servers to access emails from lawyers, including a partner responsible for the Pitney deal. Cravath declined to comment. In March, Cravath confirmed discovering a "limited breach" of its systems in 2015. |deadurl=yes |df= }}</ref>
== JONATHAN ORTIZ ==


==Rankings==
==Rankings==
Please note that all contributions to Wiki Law School are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (see Wiki Law School:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)