Editing Contracts/Liquidated damages

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 8: Line 8:
Generally, at common law, a liquidated damages clause will not be enforced if its purpose is to punish the party in breach rather than to compensate the injured party<ref>{{cite BAILII |court=UKHL |year=1914 |num=1 |litigants=Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd |parallelcite=[1915] [[Appeal Cases Law Reports|AC]] 79}}.</ref><ref name="Amev-Udc">{{cite AustLII|HCA|63|1986|litigants=Amev-Udc Finance Ltd v Austin |parallelcite=(1986) 162 [[Commonwealth Law Reports|CLR]] 170 |courtname=auto |date=}}.</ref><ref name="Plessnig ">{{cite AustLII|HCA|7|1989|litigants=Esanda Finance Corp v Plessnig  |parallelcite=(1989) 166 [[Commonwealth Law Reports|CLR]] 131 |courtname=auto |date=}}.</ref> (in which case it is referred to as a [[Contracts/Punitive damages|punitive or penalty clause]]).<ref name= "Liquidated damages, penalties and the Just Compensation rule: Some notes on an enforcement model and a theory of efficient breach" >{{Cite journal | title = Liquidated damages, penalties and the Just Compensation rule: Some notes on an enforcement model and a theory of efficient breach | journal = Columbia Law Review  | volume = 77 | issue = 4  | pages = 554–594  |jstor = 1121823|last1 = Goetz|first1 = Charles J.| last2 = Scott  | first2 = Robert E.  | year = 1977  | doi = 10.2307/1121823  }}</ref> One reason for this is that the enforcement of the term would, in effect, require an equitable order of [[specific performance]]. However, courts sitting in [[Equity (law)|equity]] will seek to achieve a fair result and will not enforce a term that will lead to the [[unjust enrichment]] of the enforcing party.<ref>{{Citation |  url = http://law.jrank.org/pages/8310/Liquidated-Damages.html | title = Liquidated Damages  | journal = American Law Encyclopedia  | volume = 6  | format = w  | accessdate = 2009-04-07 }}</ref>
Generally, at common law, a liquidated damages clause will not be enforced if its purpose is to punish the party in breach rather than to compensate the injured party<ref>{{cite BAILII |court=UKHL |year=1914 |num=1 |litigants=Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd |parallelcite=[1915] [[Appeal Cases Law Reports|AC]] 79}}.</ref><ref name="Amev-Udc">{{cite AustLII|HCA|63|1986|litigants=Amev-Udc Finance Ltd v Austin |parallelcite=(1986) 162 [[Commonwealth Law Reports|CLR]] 170 |courtname=auto |date=}}.</ref><ref name="Plessnig ">{{cite AustLII|HCA|7|1989|litigants=Esanda Finance Corp v Plessnig  |parallelcite=(1989) 166 [[Commonwealth Law Reports|CLR]] 131 |courtname=auto |date=}}.</ref> (in which case it is referred to as a [[Contracts/Punitive damages|punitive or penalty clause]]).<ref name= "Liquidated damages, penalties and the Just Compensation rule: Some notes on an enforcement model and a theory of efficient breach" >{{Cite journal | title = Liquidated damages, penalties and the Just Compensation rule: Some notes on an enforcement model and a theory of efficient breach | journal = Columbia Law Review  | volume = 77 | issue = 4  | pages = 554–594  |jstor = 1121823|last1 = Goetz|first1 = Charles J.| last2 = Scott  | first2 = Robert E.  | year = 1977  | doi = 10.2307/1121823  }}</ref> One reason for this is that the enforcement of the term would, in effect, require an equitable order of [[specific performance]]. However, courts sitting in [[Equity (law)|equity]] will seek to achieve a fair result and will not enforce a term that will lead to the [[unjust enrichment]] of the enforcing party.<ref>{{Citation |  url = http://law.jrank.org/pages/8310/Liquidated-Damages.html | title = Liquidated Damages  | journal = American Law Encyclopedia  | volume = 6  | format = w  | accessdate = 2009-04-07 }}</ref>


In order for a liquidated damages clause to be upheld, two conditions must be met.  
In order for a [https://bibloteka.com/liquidated-damages-in-construction-contracts/ liquidated damages] clause to be upheld, two conditions must be met.  
* First, the amount of the damages identified must roughly approximate the damages likely to fall upon the party seeking the benefit of the term.<ref name= "Liquidated damages, penalties and the Just Compensation rule: Some notes on an enforcement model and a theory of efficient breach" />
* First, the amount of the damages identified must roughly approximate the damages likely to fall upon the party seeking the benefit of the term.<ref name= "Liquidated damages, penalties and the Just Compensation rule: Some notes on an enforcement model and a theory of efficient breach" />
* Second, the damages must be sufficiently uncertain at the time the contract is made that such a clause will likely save both parties the future difficulty of estimating damages.
* Second, the damages must be sufficiently uncertain at the time the contract is made that such a clause will likely save both parties the future difficulty of estimating damages.
Please note that all contributions to Wiki Law School are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (see Wiki Law School:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)