Contracts/Liquidated damages

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Jump to navigationJump to search

Contracts Treatise
Table of Contents
Contracts Outline
Introduction and Definitions
Introduction
Definitions
Elements
Contract formation
Parties
Offer
Acceptance
Intention to Bind
Formal requisites
Mailbox rule
Mirror image rule
Invitation to deal
Firm offer
Consideration
Consent
Implication-in-fact
Collateral contract
Modification
Merger
Uniform Commercial Code
Uniform Commercial Code
Course of dealing
Course of performance
UCC-1 financing statement
Uniform Commercial Code adoption
Defenses against formation
Lack of capacity
Duress
Undue influence
Illusory promise
Statute of frauds
Uncertainty
Non est factum
Contract interpretation
Governing law
Construction and Operation
Parol evidence rule
Contract of adhesion
Integration clause
Contra proferentem
Excuses for non-performance
Mistake
Misrepresentation
Frustration of purpose
Impossibility
Impracticability
Illegality
Unclean hands
Unconscionability
Accord and satisfaction
Rights of third parties
Privity of contract
Assignment
Delegation
Novation
Third-party beneficiary
Performance or Breach
Necessity of performance
Sufficiency of performance
Anticipatory repudiation
Cover
Exclusion clause
Efficient breach
Deviation
Fundamental breach
Termination
Termination
Rescission
Termination and rescission
Abrogation and rescission
Subsequent contract
Termination
Forfeiture
Remedies
Specific performance
Liquidated damages
Punitive damages
Quasi-contractual obligations
Estoppel
Quantum meruit
Actions
Actions in General
Parties to Action
Pleading
Evidence
Questions of Law and Fact
Instructions
Trial and Judgment

Liquidated damages (also referred to as liquidated and ascertained damages) are damages whose amount the parties designate during the formation of a contract[1] for the injured party to collect as compensation upon a specific breach (e.g., late performance).[1]

When damages are not predetermined/assessed in advance, then the amount recoverable is said to be 'at large' (to be agreed or determined by a court or tribunal in the event of breach).

Common law[edit | edit source]

Generally, at common law, a liquidated damages clause will not be enforced if its purpose is to punish the party in breach rather than to compensate the injured party[2][3][4] (in which case it is referred to as a punitive or penalty clause).[5] One reason for this is that the enforcement of the term would, in effect, require an equitable order of specific performance. However, courts sitting in equity will seek to achieve a fair result and will not enforce a term that will lead to the unjust enrichment of the enforcing party.[6]

In order for a liquidated damages clause to be upheld, two conditions must be met.

  • First, the amount of the damages identified must roughly approximate the damages likely to fall upon the party seeking the benefit of the term.[5]
  • Second, the damages must be sufficiently uncertain at the time the contract is made that such a clause will likely save both parties the future difficulty of estimating damages.

Damages that are sufficiently uncertain may be referred to as unliquidated damages, and may be so categorized because they are not mathematically calculable or are subject to a contingency which makes the amount of damages uncertain.

Contracts under common law require there to have been some attempt to create an equal or reasonably proportionate quota between the damages made and the actual loss. Parties must not lose sight of the principal compensation and they must keep the time of execution and the difficulty of the calculations in mind when drafting the contract. [7] [8]

Example[edit | edit source]

For example, suppose Neal Townsend agrees to lease a store-front to Richard Smith, from which Richard intends to sell jewellery. If Townsend breaches the contract by refusing to lease the store-front at the appointed time, it will be difficult to determine what profits Smith will have lost because the success of newly created small businesses is highly uncertain. This, therefore, would be an appropriate circumstance for Smith to insist upon a liquidated damages clause in case Townsend fails to perform.

In the case of construction contracts, courts have occasionally refused to enforce liquidated damages provisions, choosing to follow the doctrine of concurrent delay when both parties have contributed to the overall delay of the project.

Contracts in the NEC3 family use the term 'low service damages' (optional clause X.17) and generally include a Low Service Damages Schedule.[9]

Uniform Commercial Code[edit | edit source]

In the United States, Section 2-718(1) of the Uniform Commercial Code provides that, in contracts for the sale of goods:[10]

Damages for breach by either party may be liquidated in the agreement but only at an amount which is reasonable in the light of the anticipated or actual harm caused by the breach, the difficulties of proof of loss, and the inconvenience or nonfeasibility of otherwise obtaining an adequate remedy. A term fixing unreasonably large liquidated damages is void as a penalty.

This largely mirrors the common law rule, which applies to other types of contracts under the law of most US states.

Other legal systems[edit | edit source]

Civil law[edit | edit source]

Civil law systems generally impose less severe restrictions on liquidated damages. For example, Article 1226 of the French Civil Code provides for clause pénale, a variant of liquidated damages which combines compensatory and coercive elements. Judges may adjust excessive contract penalties, but such clauses are not generally void as a matter of French law.[11]

  1. The parties may agree on the amount of the liquidated damages with respect to the failure to perform the obligation. In such case, the court may not increase or decrease the amount thereof.
  2. The liquidated damages shall not preclude the demand for performance or the exercise of the cancellation right.
  3. Any penalty is presumed to constitute liquidated damages.

In the U.S. state of Louisiana, which follows a civil law system, liquidated damages are referred to as "stipulated damages".[12] Prior to 1 January 1985, Louisiana law used the term “penal clause” under former article 2117 of the Civil Code.[13] Stipulated damages create a secondary obligation for the purpose of enforcing the principal obligation. The aggrieved party may demand either the stipulated damages or performance of the principal obligation, but may not demand both except for delay.[14] Stipulated damages may not be modified by the court (and will therefore be enforced) "unless they are so manifestly unreasonable as to be contrary to public policy".[15]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 Liquidated Damages,
  2. Template:Cite BAILII.
  3. Template:Cite AustLII.
  4. Template:Cite AustLII.
  5. 5.0 5.1  Liquidated damages, penalties and the Just Compensation rule: Some notes on an enforcement model and a theory of efficient breach, Columbia Law Review
  6.  Liquidated Damages,
  7. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2278&context=flr#page=7
  8. https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/almID/1202713659926/Defining-the-Limits-of-Liquidated-Damages-Clauses/
  9. British Institute of Facilities Management, Getting Started with the NEC3 Term Services Contract, accessed 23 June 2015
  10. § 2-718. Liquidation or Limitation of Damages; Deposits., (2012-11-20)
  11. "Clause pénale" v. liquidated damages – any similarities?,
  12. Louisiana Civil Code, Article 2005: Parties may stipulate the damages to be recovered in case of nonperformance, defective performance, or delay in performance of an obligation. http://legis.la.gov/Legis/LawSearchList.aspx accessed 23 June 2015
  13. Louisiana Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Mary Mobley v. Gary Mobley, No. 37,364-CA Archived copy,
  14. Louisiana Civil Code, Article 2007 http://legis.la.gov/Legis/Law.aspx?d=109263 accessed 23 June 2015
  15. Louisiana Civil Code, Article 2012 http://legis.la.gov/Legis/Law.aspx?d=109269 accessed 23 June 2015. See also Specific Performance: The Importance of a Clear Liquidated Damage Provision,