W. Va. Univ. Hosps. v. Casey

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
W. Va. Univ. Hosps. v. Casey
Court U.S. Supreme Court
Citation
Date decided March 11, 1991

Facts

West Virginia University Hospitals (WVUH) as the plaintiff sued Robert Casey (defendant) who was the governor of Pennsylvania.

Procedural History

42 U.S.C. § 1988 only explicitly allowed attorneys' fee but not non-attorney expert fees.

Issues

Who pays attorneys' fees? Who pays the experts who gave testimony at a hefty fee for the winning party?

Arguments

The plaintiff argued that the hospital as the winner of the suit should recover reasonable litigation costs against the government of Pennsylvania in a civil rights lawsuit.

The hospital contended the the state's Medicaid reimbursement rates were too low.

Holding

Using statutory interpretation, Justice John Paul Stevens inferred based on the legislative history that the omission of expert fees in the statute was an oversight.

Judgment

Scalia and the majority asserted that expert fees wasn't written in the statute at the time.

Reasons

Scalia rejected the purpose of the law articulated in the reports of the House and Senate.

Rule

Statutory interpretation

Comments

This is not the "Casey" decision about abortion.

Resources