Virginia v. Black

From Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Virginia v. Black
Court Supreme Court of the United States
Date decided April 7, 2003
Appealed from Supreme Court of Virginia


A Virginia statute made cross-burning a prima facie evidence of the intent to intimidate with a racial bias.

Black (a Ku Klux Klan member) burned a cross on private property with the consent of the owner in Virginia.

Procedural History

Black was criminally convicted of intent to intimidate because the jury instruction was that cross-burning itself established the intent to intimidate.

The Supreme Court of Virginia overturned Black's conviction.


Is cross-burning constitutionally protected under the First Amendment despite being a KKK practice or is cross-burning a true threat that may be legally restricted?


Cross burning isn't itself evidence of intent to intimidate.

Nevertheless, a state may enact a statute to prohibit cross burning if the act is carried out with the intent to intimidate.


Cross burning as an exercise of political speech is okay.

Cross burning as a true threat intended to cause physical harm isn't allowed.