Flast v. Cohen
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
|Flast v. Cohen|
|Court||U.S. Supreme Court|
|Citation||392 U.S. 83 (1968)|
A federal taxpayer challenged the Constitutionality of a federal statute which gave money to religious schools. He claimed that it violates the Establishment and Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment.
Whether a federal taxpayer has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a federal statute which is claimed to violate federal taxing and spending programs.
There is no absolute bar in Article III to suits by federal taxpayers challenging allegedly unconstitutional federal taxing and spending programs.
There are two requirements:
- The taxpayer must establish a nexus between that status and the type of legislative enactment attacked.
- The taxpayer must establish a nexus between that status and the precise nature of the constitutional infringement alleged
Dissent:The court’s standard for the determination of standing and its criteria for the satisfaction of that standard are entirely unrelated.