Only logged-in users can create and edit pages

Fenwick & West

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Jump to: navigation, search
Loading map...
Fenwick & West
Fenwick & West logo.png
Headquarters Mountain View (CA)
The following coordinate was not recognized: Geocoding failed.
The following coordinate was not recognized: Geocoding failed.
Number of attorneys 359
Practice Areas Corporate, litigation, tax, intellectual property, labor and employment
Annual Revenue $327 million
Annual Profit Per Equity Partner $1.5 million
Fenwick & West Pay Scale
(all numbers in thousands of dollars)
First year salary180
Second year salary
Third year salary
Fourth year salary
Fifth year salary
Sixth year salary
Seventh year salary
Eighth year salary
Ninth year salary
Tenth year salary
bonus
bonus
bonus
bonus
bonus
bonus
bonus
bonus
bonus
bonus

Fenwick & West LLP is a law firm of more than 300 attorneys with offices in Silicon Valley, San Francisco, Seattle, New York City, and Shanghai. The firm's practice focuses on technology companies and start-ups.[1] Fenwick's lawyers are divided among four primary practice groups, with numerous subgroups within each: Corporate, Litigation, Tax and Intellectual Property. It is ranked as one of the 100 largest law firms in the United States, and is one of the most prestigious and selective law firms according to American Lawyer magazine.[2] Fenwick has worked on a variety of high-profile matters for clients such as Facebook, Google, Uber, Airbnb, Fitbit, Dropbox, Apple, WhatsApp, and Cisco.

In 2008, IP Business & Law listed Fenwick as one of only 20 "go to law firms on the cutting edge of patent litigation,"[3] and in 2011, Global Law Experts named Fenwick & West the #1 antitrust law firm.[4]

Larry Kramer, dean of Stanford Law School, told Bloomberg Businessweek that Fenwick "is one of the great indigenous firms of Silicon Valley," noting that "[the firm] understands how the Valley works better than most, everything from how to raise money, where to incorporate, and how to nurture and grow a startup."[1]

Prior to taking Facebook public in 2012,[5] American Lawyer said, "Fenwick’s work was critical in allowing the social media company to stay private for so long." The firm's patent prosecution team brought Facebook in as an intellectual property client a few months before their corporate colleagues in 2007.[6]

"Where many big firms have eschewed patent prosecution as commodity work that goes to the lowest bidder, Fenwick has embraced it as central to the mission of its technology and life sciences clients and start-ups whose small IP portfolios can be the crown jewels of their business."[6]

Milestones

2014

2013

  • Fenwick announces a new version of the Series Seed Documents on GitHub, curated by Fenwick Partner Ted Wang.[8]

2012

  • Fenwick is the #1 issuer adviser on IPOs both globally and in the United States; in the U.S., the firm handled 41 percent of the IPO market by volume and globally, Fenwick handled 17 percent[9]
  • Fenwick represents Facebook in its $1 billion purchase of Instagram[10]
  • Fenwick represents Facebook in its IPO, the largest Internet IPO in U.S. history[5][11]

2011

2010

  • Fenwick partner Ralph Pais creates Flex by Fenwick[1][17]

2000

Clients

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=news }}
  2. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named amlaw
  3. http://www.fenwick.com/services/practices/Pages/intellectual-property.aspx
  4. Template:Cite press release
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=news }}
  6. 6.0 6.1 {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}
  7. {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}
  8. {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}
  9. {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}
  10. 10.0 10.1 {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}
  11. 11.0 11.1 {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}
  12. Masnick, Mike, Judge Rules That Righthaven Lawsuit Was A Sham; Threatens Sanctions. June 14, 2011.
  13. Green, Steve, Ruling that Righthaven misled court likely to be felt in other cases. July 14, 2011.
  14. Anderson, Nate, Righthaven learning it can't change the facts after it sues. July 14, 2011
  15. Opsahl, Kurt, Righthaven Ordered to Pay $5,000 in Sanctions for Its Misrepresentations to Court. July 15, 2011.
  16. {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}
  17. {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}
  18. "Extending Their Domain", ALM Media, LLC, New York City, April 2000.
  19. 19.0 19.1 19.2 19.3 {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}
  20. {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=news }}

External links