Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Redirected from Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.)
Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music | |
Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
---|---|
Citation | 510 U.S. 569 |
Date decided | March 7, 1994 |
Appealed from | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit |
Case Opinions | |
unanimous | written by David H. Souter |
concurrence | written by Anthony M. Kennedy |
Facts
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. sued 2 Live Crew and their record company, claiming that 2 Live Crew's song "Pretty Woman" infringed Acuff-Rose's copyright in Roy Orbison's "Oh, Pretty Woman." The District Court granted summary judgment for 2 Live Crew, holding that its song was a parody that made fair use of the original song. In reversing, the Court of Appeals held that the commercial nature of the parody rendered it presumptively unfair.
Issues
May 2 Live Crew's commercial parody of Roy Orbison's "Oh, Pretty Woman" be a fair use within the meaning of the Copyright Act of 1976?
Holding
Yes. A parody's commercial character is only one element to be weighed in a fair use enquiry.
Insufficient consideration was given to the nature of parody in weighing the degree of copying. The Court of Appeals erred in applying the presumption that the commercial nature of the parody rendered it presumptively unfair, as no such evidentiary presumption was available to address either the character and purpose of the use or the market harm. The appellate court "erred in holding that 2 Live Crew had necessarily copied excessively from the Orbison original, considering the parodic purpose of the use."Resources