Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
|Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp|
|Court||Supreme Court of California|
|Citation||53 Cal.3d 987|
810 P.2d 549
281 Cal.Rptr. 528
|Date decided||May 30, 1991|
Defendants were manufacturers of products containing asbestos, and the plaintiff contracted lung ailments through exposure to asbestos while working as an electrician.
The court of appeal allowed the admissibility of state of the art evidence to proffer evidence of knowability.
Whether a defendant in a products liability action based upon a failure to warn of a risk of harm may present evidence of the state of the art.Whether knowability is an element of a failure-to-warn strict liability case.Whether admitting state of the art evidence improperly infuses negligence concepts into strict liability cases by directing the trier of fact’s attention to the conduct of the manufacturer rather than to the condition of the product.
The courts require knowledge, actual or constructive, of potential risk or danger before imposing strict liability for a failure to warn. Therefore the state of the art may be relevant to the question of knowability, and should be admissible.Knowledge or knowability is a component of strict liability for failure to warn.