White Plains v. Cintas: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:08, February 1, 2024

White Plains Coat & Apron Co. = "White Plains" = "White" = a New York company = a linen rental business
Cintas Corp. = "Cintas" = a national company serving many businesses = a company that rented linens
Cintas lured the customers of White away by offering lower rates for linen rentals
Many business customers of White would break their contracts in order to switch over to Cintas

White sued Cintas
White stated that Cintas was liable for tortious interference with contract under New York state law

White argued that Cintas knew that the customers had contracts with White.
Cintas claimed that it wasn't aware of the contracts the customers had with White.

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 |procedural_history=*White sued Cintas
 *White stated that Cintas was liable for [https://www.quimbee.com/keyterms/intentional-interference-with-contractual-relations tortious interference with contract] under New York state law
+|arguments=* White argued that Cintas knew that the customers had contracts with White.
+* Cintas claimed that it wasn't aware of the contracts the customers had with White.
 |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
 |link=https://casetext.com/case/white-v-cintas