United States v. Stump Home Specialties Mfg.: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court= |citation=905 F.2d 1117 (1990) |date=1990 |subject=Contracts |appealed_from= |case_treatment=No |overturned= |partially_overturned= |reaffirmed= |...") |
Lost Student (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "|case_treatment=No " to "") |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|subject=Contracts | |subject=Contracts | ||
|appealed_from= | |appealed_from= | ||
|overturned= | |overturned= | ||
|partially_overturned= | |partially_overturned= |
Latest revision as of 03:44, July 14, 2023
United States v. Stump Home Specialties Mfg. | |
Court | |
---|---|
Citation | 905 F.2d 1117 (1990) |
Date decided | 1990 |
Rule
The purpose for not allowing pre-existing duty without additional consideration is to prevent coercive modifications.
Although it is slight, any consideration will suffice to show that contract modification is enforceable.
The plaintiff would need to use the defense of duress to prevent abuse.