United States v. Montoya de Hernandez: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court=Supreme Court of the United States |date=July 1, 1985 |appealed_from=9th Circuit |case_treatment=No |facts=A balloon swallower ("Rose") had from fr...")
 
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
|facts=A balloon swallower ("Rose") had from from Bogota, Colombia to the United States. She aroused the suspicion of the customs agents at the Los Angeles airport.
|facts=A balloon swallower ("Rose") had from from Bogota, Colombia to the United States. She aroused the suspicion of the customs agents at the Los Angeles airport.


After being strip-searched, officers decided that Rose's midsection was full and stiff.
After being strip-searched, officers decided that Rose's midsection was full and stiff. At this juncture, she refused the request for an X-ray.
|comments=This is the balloon swallower case.
|comments=This is the balloon swallower case.
}}
}}

Revision as of 12:20, September 24, 2022

United States v. Montoya de Hernandez
Court Supreme Court of the United States
Citation
Date decided July 1, 1985
Appealed from 9th Circuit

Facts

A balloon swallower ("Rose") had from from Bogota, Colombia to the United States. She aroused the suspicion of the customs agents at the Los Angeles airport.

After being strip-searched, officers decided that Rose's midsection was full and stiff. At this juncture, she refused the request for an X-ray.

Comments

This is the balloon swallower case.