Editing United States v. Darby Lumber Co.
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Whether Congress has the power to prohibit he employment of workmen in the production of goods for interstate commerce at other than prescribed wages and hours. | Whether Congress has the power to prohibit he employment of workmen in the production of goods for interstate commerce at other than prescribed wages and hours. | ||
|holding=Hammer v. Dagenhart overruled. | |holding=Hammer v. Dagenhart overruled. | ||
SCOTUS announces that Congress has the power to impose a production quota on wheat. | |||
|rule=Such regulation is not a forbidden of state power merely because either its motive or its consequence is to restrict the use of articles of commerce within the states of destination and is not prohibited unless by other Constitutional provisions. | |rule=Such regulation is not a forbidden of state power merely because either its motive or its consequence is to restrict the use of articles of commerce within the states of destination and is not prohibited unless by other Constitutional provisions. | ||
The distinction on which the decision was rested that Congressional power to prohibit [[Constitution_of_the_United_States#Commerce|interstate commerce]] is limited to articles which in themselves have some harmful or deleterious property has long since been abandoned. | The distinction on which the decision was rested that Congressional power to prohibit [[Constitution_of_the_United_States#Commerce|interstate commerce]] is limited to articles which in themselves have some harmful or deleterious property has long since been abandoned. | ||
}} | }} | ||
