 |
Wiki Law School will soon be moving! Please update your bookmarks. Our future address is www.wikilawschool.org |
Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
Lost Student (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "|case_treatment=No " to "") |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|subject=First Amendment | |subject=First Amendment | ||
|appealed_from=8th Circuit | |appealed_from=8th Circuit | ||
|facts=Many states have laws against publicly funding religious organizations in accordance with the '''Establishment Clause''' of the [[1st Amendment]]. | |facts=Many states have laws against publicly funding religious organizations in accordance with the '''Establishment Clause''' of the [[1st Amendment]]. | ||
| Line 17: | Line 16: | ||
8th Circuit affirms the court and reiterates that Comer was also following the state Constitution of Missouri to not fund religious organizations. | 8th Circuit affirms the court and reiterates that Comer was also following the state Constitution of Missouri to not fund religious organizations. | ||
|issues=Does excluding Church from a state grant violating the Free Exercise Clause under the 1st Amendment? | |||
|holding=Excluding "Church" from a generally-available grant violates Church's Free Exercise Clause rights. | |||
SCOTUS holds that Comer discriminated against Church on the basis of religion. | |||
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | ||
|link=https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/582/15-577/ | |link=https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/582/15-577/ | ||
| Line 22: | Line 25: | ||
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | }}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | ||
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/trinity-lutheran-church-of-columbia-inc-v-comer | |link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/trinity-lutheran-church-of-columbia-inc-v-comer | ||
|case_text_source=Quimbee | |source_type=Video summary | ||
|case_text_source=Quimbee | |||
}} | }} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 03:44, July 14, 2023
| Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer | |
| Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
|---|---|
| Citation | |
| Date decided | June 26, 2017 |
| Appealed from | 8th Circuit |
Facts
Many states have laws against publicly funding religious organizations in accordance with the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment.
The Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MoDNR) reimburses organization that re-surface their playgrounds with recycled tires.
Carol Comer ("Comer") was the Director of MoDNR.
In 2012, Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia ("Church") applied for a grant from Comer under the tire recycling program. Church's application is denied.
Comer denied funding to resurface Church's playground because it was a religious organization.Procedural History
The district court dismissed Church's funding claim because the court ruled that the Free Exercise Clause doesn't require funding Church.
8th Circuit affirms the court and reiterates that Comer was also following the state Constitution of Missouri to not fund religious organizations.Issues
Does excluding Church from a state grant violating the Free Exercise Clause under the 1st Amendment?
Holding
Excluding "Church" from a generally-available grant violates Church's Free Exercise Clause rights.
SCOTUS holds that Comer discriminated against Church on the basis of religion.
