 |
Wiki Law School will soon be moving! Please update your bookmarks. Our future address is www.wikilawschool.org |
Tanzymore v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court=U.S. Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit |citation=457 F.2d 1320 (3d Cir. 1972) |date=March 29, 1972 |subject=Civil Procedure }} '''Facts'''''''''Tanz...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|subject=Civil Procedure | |subject=Civil Procedure | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''Facts''': | |||
Tanzymore filed a complaint in the federal court seeking damages for personal injuries against a Pennsylvania company. Depositions were taken, and while the complaint alleged Tanzymore was an Ohio domiciliary, nothing in the deposition was consistent with this assertion. | |||
Revision as of 18:51, March 7, 2020
| Tanzymore v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. | |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit |
|---|---|
| Citation | 457 F.2d 1320 (3d Cir. 1972) |
| Date decided | March 29, 1972 |
Facts:
Tanzymore filed a complaint in the federal court seeking damages for personal injuries against a Pennsylvania company. Depositions were taken, and while the complaint alleged Tanzymore was an Ohio domiciliary, nothing in the deposition was consistent with this assertion.
Issues
Whether a hearing is required to determine domiciliary residence, or whether the burden of supporting the allegations is on the plaintiff.
Holding/Decision
Complaint dismissed.
Rules
A hearing is not required so long as the court has afforded the plaintiff notice and a fair opportunity to be heard.When the jurisdictional allegations are traversed, the plaintiff has the burden of supporting those allegations.
