Wiki Law School will soon be moving! Please update your bookmarks. Our future address is www.wikilawschool.org |
TVA v. Hill: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|issues=Congress had to balance the need for rural economic development versus species protection. | |issues=Congress had to balance the need for rural economic development versus species protection. | ||
| judgment = The majority of the Court ruled that the dam construction must halt. | |||
| reasons = | |||
| rule = | |||
| comments = Congress had to amend the Engendered Species Act to allow exemptions for projects with significant value to the public. | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 19:09, May 30, 2022
TVA v. Hill | |
Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
---|---|
Citation | |
Date decided | June 15, 1978 |
Appealed from | United States Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit |
Facts
The construction of the Tellico Dam would endanger the life of a newly designated as endangered fish species know as snail darter (perch).
Tennessee Valley Authority has received Congressional funds to construct the dam in Tennessee.Issues
Congress had to balance the need for rural economic development versus species protection.
Judgment
The majority of the Court ruled that the dam construction must halt.
Comments
Congress had to amend the Engendered Species Act to allow exemptions for projects with significant value to the public.