Summers v. Dooley
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
| Summers v. Dooley | |
| Court | |
|---|---|
| Citation | |
| Date decided | |
Facts: Parties formed a partnership to operate a trash collection business. When one was unable to work, he hired a replacement at his own cost. in '62, Dooley became unable to work, and hired a replacement. Summers wanted to hire additional help, but Dooley said no. Summers did anyway, and paid out of pocket for the help, then sued for reimbursement.
Arguments: P said that D still profited from the work of the 3d party even though he didn't want to hire him.
Holding: No compensation.
Reasons: It is unjust to permit recovery of an expense which was incurred individually and not for the benefit of the partnership but rather for the benefit on one partner.
