Wiki Law School will soon be moving! Please update your bookmarks. Our future address is www.wikilawschool.org |
Step-Saver Data Systems v. Wyse (1991): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Lost Student (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "|case_treatment=Yes " to "") |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|date=July 29, 1991 | |date=July 29, 1991 | ||
|subject=Contracts | |subject=Contracts | ||
|overturned=Step-Saver Data Systems v. Wyse (1990) | |overturned=Step-Saver Data Systems v. Wyse (1990) | ||
|facts=Step-Saver Data Systems, Inc. ("Step-Saver") sold computer management systems that bundled | |||
|facts=Step-Saver Data Systems, Inc. ("Step-Saver") sold computer management | |||
(an IBM computer) + (remote terminals by Wyse Technology) + (software called "Multi-link Advanced" by TSL) | (an IBM computer) + (remote terminals by Wyse Technology) + (software called "Multi-link Advanced" by TSL) | ||
Line 24: | Line 22: | ||
Step-Saver argued that he never agreed to the '''box-top license''', & that the contract was formed on the phone when ordering the software. Note that the defendant had tried to get the plaintiff to expressly agree to the license terms, which were ignored twice. | Step-Saver argued that he never agreed to the '''box-top license''', & that the contract was formed on the phone when ordering the software. Note that the defendant had tried to get the plaintiff to expressly agree to the license terms, which were ignored twice. | ||
The district court held that the parties intended to adopt the box-top license as the complete and final expression of terms of their agreement. <==> Step-Saver lost. | The district court held that the parties intended to adopt the box-top license as the complete and final expression of terms of their agreement. <==> [[Step-Saver Data Systems v. Wyse (1990)|Step-Saver lost]]. | ||
|issues=Whether additional terms are valid when after the formation of a contract, these additional terms are offered and stated that they are to be accepted upon further fulfillment of the contract. | |issues=Whether additional terms are valid when after the formation of a contract, these additional terms are offered and stated that they are to be accepted upon further fulfillment of the contract. | ||
Line 45: | Line 43: | ||
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | }}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | ||
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/step-saver-data-systems-inc-v-wyse-technology-939-f-2d-91-1991 | |link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/step-saver-data-systems-inc-v-wyse-technology-939-f-2d-91-1991 | ||
|case_text_source=Quimbee | |source_type=Video summary | ||
|case_text_source=Quimbee | |||
}} | }} | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 03:35, July 14, 2023
Step-Saver Data Systems v. Wyse (1991) | |
Court | 3rd Circuit |
---|---|
Citation | 939 F.2d 91 (1991) |
Date decided | July 29, 1991 |
Overturned | Step-Saver Data Systems v. Wyse (1990) |
Facts
Step-Saver Data Systems, Inc. ("Step-Saver") sold computer management systems that bundled
(an IBM computer) + (remote terminals by Wyse Technology) + (software called "Multi-link Advanced" by TSL)
The Software Link, Inc. (TSL) is now a defunct software company.
Wyse was acquired by Dell in 2012.
Step-Saver (plaintiff) was the seller of a hardware/software bundle and had entered into a contract with the defendant ("Wyse") to purchase software for the in its package.
Procedural History
Step-Saver filed a suit against the defendant ("Wyse"; both Wyse & TSL) for breach of warranty. The defendant claimed that a box-top warranty applied to Step-Saver’s purchase which effectively disclaimed the defendant from any damages.
Step-Saver argued that he never agreed to the box-top license, & that the contract was formed on the phone when ordering the software. Note that the defendant had tried to get the plaintiff to expressly agree to the license terms, which were ignored twice.
The district court held that the parties intended to adopt the box-top license as the complete and final expression of terms of their agreement. <==> Step-Saver lost.Issues
Whether additional terms are valid when after the formation of a contract, these additional terms are offered and stated that they are to be accepted upon further fulfillment of the contract.
If contract terms are reflected in an exchange of writings, may they be altered by one party's printing of a box-top license that includes different terms?Holding
Holding reversed and remanded for further consideration of Step-Saver’s express and implied warranty claims against TSL.
No. Contract terms reflected in an exchange of writings may not be altered by 1 party's printing of a box-top license with significantly different terms.Reasons
Rule
Other court decisions have held
(box-top license) = (shrink-wrap license)
against the customer, who here was Step-Saver, even though Step-Saver prevailed in this case.