Wiki Law School will soon be moving! Please update your bookmarks. Our future address is www.wikilawschool.org |
Slaughter-House Cases: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|subject=Constitutional Law | |subject=Constitutional Law | ||
|case_treatment=No | |case_treatment=No | ||
|facts=The Louisiana legislature gave a monopoly in the livestock landing and slaughterhouse business to Crescent City Livestock company. The law required that the company allow any person to slaughter animals in the slaughterhouse for a fixed fee. Several butchers brought suit challenging the monopoly. | |facts=Unregulated butchers had contaminated the Mississippi River for years, thereby, causing regular cholera outbreaks. | ||
The Louisiana legislature gave a 25-year monopoly in the livestock landing and slaughterhouse business to '''Crescent City Livestock''' company ("Company"). The law required that the company allow any person to slaughter animals in the slaughterhouse for a fixed fee. Several butchers brought suit challenging the monopoly. | |||
400 butchers lost their jobs & formed the '''Butchers' Benevolent Assn. of New Orleans''' ("Butchers"). | |||
|procedural_history="Butchers" sued the "Company" claiming that the Louisiana monopoly grant to the Company created an involuntary servitude in violation of the [[13th Amendment]]. | |||
|issues=Whether the state grant of a monopoly violates the US Constitution by creating involuntary servitude, or denying due process? | |||
|rule=The privileges and immunities relied on in the argument are those which belong to citizens of the States as such, and that they are left to the State governments for security and protection, and not by this article placed under the special care of the Federal government. | |||
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | ||
|link=https://landmarkcases.c-span.org/Case/3/The-Slaughterhouse-Cases | |link=https://landmarkcases.c-span.org/Case/3/The-Slaughterhouse-Cases | ||
Line 17: | Line 24: | ||
}} | }} | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''Issues''' | '''Issues''' | ||
Line 27: | Line 30: | ||
The monopoly is valid. | The monopoly is valid. | ||
Revision as of 16:48, May 23, 2023
Slaughter-House Cases | |
Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
---|---|
Citation | 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 36 (1873) |
Date decided | April 14, 1873 |
Facts
Unregulated butchers had contaminated the Mississippi River for years, thereby, causing regular cholera outbreaks.
The Louisiana legislature gave a 25-year monopoly in the livestock landing and slaughterhouse business to Crescent City Livestock company ("Company"). The law required that the company allow any person to slaughter animals in the slaughterhouse for a fixed fee. Several butchers brought suit challenging the monopoly.
400 butchers lost their jobs & formed the Butchers' Benevolent Assn. of New Orleans ("Butchers").Procedural History
"Butchers" sued the "Company" claiming that the Louisiana monopoly grant to the Company created an involuntary servitude in violation of the 13th Amendment.
Issues
Whether the state grant of a monopoly violates the US Constitution by creating involuntary servitude, or denying due process?
Rule
The privileges and immunities relied on in the argument are those which belong to citizens of the States as such, and that they are left to the State governments for security and protection, and not by this article placed under the special care of the Federal government.
Resources
Issues
Holding
The monopoly is valid.