Editing Shelby County v. Holder
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|appealed_from=U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit | |appealed_from=U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit | ||
|cited=McCulloch v. Maryland | |cited=McCulloch v. Maryland | ||
|facts=The | |facts=The Voting Rights Act of 1965, Section 5 required certain states and local governments to obtain federal preclearance before implementing any changes to their voting laws or practices. Section 4(b) contained the coverage formula that determines which jurisdictions are subjected to <span style="background:yellow">preclearance regime</span> based on their histories of discrimination in voting. | ||
|procedural_history=Shelby County, Alabama sued U.S. Attorney General [[Eric H. Holder, Jr.]] in the U.S. District Court for D.C., which found the Voting Rights Act of 1965 constitutional | |procedural_history=Shelby County, Alabama sued U.S. Attorney General [[Eric H. Holder, Jr.]] in the U.S. District Court for D.C., which found the Voting Rights Act of 1965 constitutional. Shelby County appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, which affirmed the lower court's decision. | ||
Shelby County appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, which affirmed the lower court's decision. | |||
|issues=Is Section 4(b) unconstitutional? | |issues=Is Section 4(b) unconstitutional? | ||
|arguments=The coverage formula of Section 4(b) is based on data over 40 years old, making it no longer responsive to current needs and therefore an impermissible burden on the constitutional principles of federalism and equal sovereignty of the states. | |arguments=The coverage formula of Section 4(b) is based on data over 40 years old, making it no longer responsive to current needs and therefore an impermissible burden on the constitutional principles of federalism and equal sovereignty of the states. |