Wiki Law School will soon be moving! Please update your bookmarks. Our future address is www.wikilawschool.org |
Editing Saenz v. Roe
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|procedural_history=Sáenz, Director of the California Department of Social Services, loses at the federal district court in California. | |procedural_history=Sáenz, Director of the California Department of Social Services, loses at the federal district court in California. | ||
|issues=Should SCOTUS apply the [[strict scrutiny]] standard of review in this case? | |issues=Should SCOTUS apply the [[strict scrutiny]] standard of review in this case? | ||
|holding=The state statute of California imposing a durational residency requirement to limit welfare benefits goes against the "[[Constitution_of_the_United_States#Section_1_.28Privileges_or_Immunities_Clause.29|privileges or immunities]]" in the 14th Amendment, Section 1, Clause 2. | |holding=The state statute of California imposing a durational residency requirement to limit welfare benefits goes against the "[[Constitution_of_the_United_States#Section_1_.28Privileges_or_Immunities_Clause.29|privileges or immunities]]" in the 14th Amendment, Section 1, Clause 2. | ||
|reasons=The right to travel among states is a fundamental right of US citizens. | |reasons=The right to travel among states is a fundamental right of US citizens. |