Royal Business Machines, Inc. v. Lorraine Corp.: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court=U.S. Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit |citation=633 F.2d 34 (1980) |date=1980 |subject=Contracts }} '''Facts''' Royal sold and Booher purchased p...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''Facts''' | '''Facts''' | ||
Royal sold and Booher purchased plain paper copying machines. | Royal sold and Booher purchased plain paper copying machines. | ||
Latest revision as of 22:19, April 27, 2020
| Royal Business Machines, Inc. v. Lorraine Corp. | |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit |
|---|---|
| Citation | 633 F.2d 34 (1980) |
| Date decided | 1980 |
Facts
Royal sold and Booher purchased plain paper copying machines.
Issues
- Whether general statements to the effect of goods can be considered an express warranty.
- Whether future predictions can be an express warranty.
- Whether later transactions can be susceptible to express warranty when the buyer has more knowledge of reality.
Holding
- No
- Yes
- No
