Wiki Law School will soon be moving! Please update your bookmarks. Our future address is www.wikilawschool.org |
Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Lost Student (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Lost Student (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|date=April 8, 1895 | |date=April 8, 1895 | ||
|subject=Tax Law | |subject=Tax Law | ||
|appealed_from= | |||
|Court_opinion_parts= | |||
| | |||
| | |||
}} | }} | ||
'''Holding:''' Unapportioned income taxes on interest, dividends, and rents imposed by the Income Tax Act of 1894 are direct taxes, and are therefore unconstitutional. | '''Holding:''' Unapportioned income taxes on interest, dividends, and rents imposed by the Income Tax Act of 1894 are direct taxes, and are therefore unconstitutional. |
Revision as of 05:20, September 9, 2020
Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. | |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
---|---|
Citation | 157 US 429 (1895) |
Date decided | April 8, 1895 |
Holding: Unapportioned income taxes on interest, dividends, and rents imposed by the Income Tax Act of 1894 are direct taxes, and are therefore unconstitutional.