Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "157 U.S. 429. '''Holding:''' Unapportioned income taxes on interest, dividends, and rents imposed by the Income Tax Act of 1894 are direct taxes, and are therefore unconstitu...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
157 U.S. 429.
{{Infobox Case Brief
 
| court                = U.S. Supreme Court
| citation              = 157 US 429 (1895)
| date                  = April 8, 1895
| subject              = Tax Law
| appealed_from        =
| overturned            =
| partially_overturned  =
| reaffirmed            =
| questioned            =
| criticized            =
| distinguished        =
| cited                =
| followed              =
| related              =
}}
{{Court opinion part <!-- repeat as needed, one for each opinion -->
| opinion_order        =
| opinion_type          = <!-- "majority," "plurality," "unanimous," "concurrence," "dissent," OR "concur/dissent" -->
| written_by            =
| joined_by            =
}}
'''Holding:''' Unapportioned income taxes on interest, dividends, and rents imposed by the Income Tax Act of 1894 are direct taxes, and are therefore unconstitutional.
'''Holding:''' Unapportioned income taxes on interest, dividends, and rents imposed by the Income Tax Act of 1894 are direct taxes, and are therefore unconstitutional.
[[Category:Cases:Tax Law]]

Revision as of 22:44, December 31, 2019

Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.
Court U.S. Supreme Court
Citation 157 US 429 (1895)
Date decided April 8, 1895

Holding: Unapportioned income taxes on interest, dividends, and rents imposed by the Income Tax Act of 1894 are direct taxes, and are therefore unconstitutional.