O'Dell v. Stegall

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Revision as of 21:16, April 18, 2024 by DeRien (talk | contribs)

O'Dell v. Stegall
Court West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals
Citation 703 S.E.2d 561
Date decided November 24, 2010

Facts

  • O'Dell = purchaser of a church land in West Virginia re-purposed for residential use
  • O'Dell's new property had direct access to a public road through a driveway on the building's south side
  • On the north side of O'Dell's property was a gravel lane connected to the aforesaid public road
  • Ownership of the gravel lane was unknown
  • Stegall = owner of a private property dependent on the gravel lane to access the public road; Stegall's house was to the north of the gravel lane
  • Stegall was paying for the upkeep of the gravel lane.

Procedural History

  • O'Dell sued Stegall & neighbors to the north seeking legal recognition of his prescriptive easement of the gravel lane.
  • O'Dell won in the trial court.

Issues

  • Must land use supporting a prescriptive easement be adverse, continuous, & either
    • actually known or
    • open & notorious?

Arguments

  • O'Dell argued that he had a prescriptive easement over the gravel road because churchgoers had been using the gravel road on the north to access the former church
  • Stegall argued that O'Dell's use of the gravel lane was causing wear & tear

Holding

Yes. A prescriptive easement can only arise from a use that's adverse, continuous, & either actually known or open & notorious.

Rule

  • Prescriptive easement = an easement acquired by adverse possession
  • American courts generally dis-favor prescriptive easements

Resources