 |
Wiki Law School will soon be moving! Please update your bookmarks. Our future address is www.wikilawschool.org |
New York Times v. Sullivan: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
Lost Student (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "|case_treatment=No " to "") |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|date=March 9, 1964 | |date=March 9, 1964 | ||
|subject=First Amendment | |subject=First Amendment | ||
| | |appealed_from=Alabama Supreme Court | ||
|facts=In 1960, a civil rights organization took out a page of advertisement in the ''New York Times''. The ad accuses the opponents of civil rights of a "wave of terror." Namely, the [https://www.montgomeryal.gov/government/city-government/city-departments/police Montgomery Police Department in Alabama] was accused of targeting MLK with intimidation such as "[https://www.archives.gov/exhibits/documented-rights/exhibit/section4/detail/heed-rising-voices-transcript.html They have arrested him 7 times-for “speeding.” “loitering”]. | |facts=In 1960, a civil rights organization took out a page of advertisement in the ''New York Times''. The ad accuses the opponents of civil rights of a "wave of terror." Namely, the [https://www.montgomeryal.gov/government/city-government/city-departments/police Montgomery Police Department in Alabama] was accused of targeting MLK with intimidation such as "[https://www.archives.gov/exhibits/documented-rights/exhibit/section4/detail/heed-rising-voices-transcript.html They have arrested him 7 times-for “speeding.” “loitering”]. | ||
The Alabama police countered that there were false and inaccurate statements in the advertisement because the Alabama police never pad-locked the Alabama State College dining hall to starve the students, never arrested MLK 7 times for speeding, and so on. Other claims were exaggerated. Therefore, the article defamed the Alabama police departments. | The Alabama police countered that there were false and inaccurate statements in the advertisement because the Alabama police never pad-locked the [https://www.alasu.edu/ Alabama State College] dining hall to starve the students, never arrested MLK 7 times for speeding, and so on. Other claims were exaggerated. Therefore, the article defamed the Alabama police departments. | ||
[https://crdl.usg.edu/people/sullivan_l_b Sullivan], the Montgomery police commissioner, objected to the defamatory piece. | |||
|procedural_history=Sullivan sued ''The New York Times'' in Alabama state court [https://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/186/new-york-times-co-v-sullivan for libel]. (Libel is defamatory writing while slander is defamatory spoken words.) The trial judge ruled in Sullivan's favor. | |||
The Alabama Supreme Court concurred that Sullivan's reputation and that of his police department had been damaged. It found in favor of Sullivan. | |||
|issues=Can a public official bring a defamation suit for false statements concerning public issues? | |||
|holding=The [[1st Amendment]] protects defamation of ''public'' officials. | |||
|reasons=Brennan reasoned that public debates may include false information. | |||
|rule=If a public official can show "<span style="background:red"><big>actual malice</big></span>" in addition to defamation, then the official may prevail on a defamation claim. (This standard of burden is unrealistically hard to meet.) | |||
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | ||
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/new-york-times-co-v-sullivan | |link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/new-york-times-co-v-sullivan | ||
|case_text_source=Quimbee | |source_type=Video summary | ||
|case_text_source=Quimbee | |||
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | }}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | ||
|link=https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/376/254/ | |link=https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/376/254/ | ||
Latest revision as of 03:40, July 14, 2023
| New York Times v. Sullivan | |
| Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
|---|---|
| Citation | |
| Date decided | March 9, 1964 |
| Appealed from | Alabama Supreme Court |
| Cited by | |
| Cohen v. Cowles Media (1991) | |
Facts
In 1960, a civil rights organization took out a page of advertisement in the New York Times. The ad accuses the opponents of civil rights of a "wave of terror." Namely, the Montgomery Police Department in Alabama was accused of targeting MLK with intimidation such as "They have arrested him 7 times-for “speeding.” “loitering”.
The Alabama police countered that there were false and inaccurate statements in the advertisement because the Alabama police never pad-locked the Alabama State College dining hall to starve the students, never arrested MLK 7 times for speeding, and so on. Other claims were exaggerated. Therefore, the article defamed the Alabama police departments.
Sullivan, the Montgomery police commissioner, objected to the defamatory piece.Procedural History
Sullivan sued The New York Times in Alabama state court for libel. (Libel is defamatory writing while slander is defamatory spoken words.) The trial judge ruled in Sullivan's favor.
The Alabama Supreme Court concurred that Sullivan's reputation and that of his police department had been damaged. It found in favor of Sullivan.Issues
Can a public official bring a defamation suit for false statements concerning public issues?
Holding
The 1st Amendment protects defamation of public officials.
Reasons
Brennan reasoned that public debates may include false information.
Rule
If a public official can show "actual malice" in addition to defamation, then the official may prevail on a defamation claim. (This standard of burden is unrealistically hard to meet.)
