New York Central Iron Works Co. v. United States Radiator Co.

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Revision as of 03:37, March 8, 2020 by Mitchman (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court=Court of Appeals of New York |citation=174 N.Y. 331*66 N.E. 967 (1903) |date=1903 |subject=Contracts }} '''Facts''' Defendant became bound to fu...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

New York Central Iron Works Co. v. United States Radiator Co.
Court Court of Appeals of New York
Citation 174 N.Y. 331
66 N.E. 967 (1903)
Date decided 1903

Facts

Defendant became bound to furnish the plaintiff with their entire radiator needs for the year 1899 by written contract. The previous year the plaintiff had 48,000 feet of radiation delivered, but this year they required up to 100,000 feet. The defendant refused to deliver more than the previous years’ amount claiming there was a mutual mistake in framing the contract. This didn’t work, so the defendant claimed that the limitation was implied in the contract.


Procedural History

Action to recover damages for the breach of a written executory contract.


Issues

Whether a contract that is open to the quantity of goods that one is bound to deliver has an implied limitation.


Holding

Judgment affirmed for the plaintiff.


Reasoning

Because the plaintiff acted reasonably and in good faith, and the defendant bound the plaintiff to deal exclusively in goods to be ordered from it under the contract, the plaintiff is entitled to such profits as may accrue to him by reason of a favorable contract.