Editing NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|date=1937 | |date=1937 | ||
|subject=Constitutional Law | |subject=Constitutional Law | ||
|case_treatment=No | |||
|facts=The '''National Labor Relations Act''' (the Wagner Act) was challenged by the steel company when the company was found guilty of violating the act by engaging in unfair labor practices affecting commerce. | |facts=The '''National Labor Relations Act''' (the Wagner Act) was challenged by the steel company when the company was found guilty of violating the act by engaging in unfair labor practices affecting commerce. | ||
|issues=What is the extent of Congressional power under the [[Constitution_of_the_United_States#Commerce|commerce clause]]? | |issues=What is the extent of Congressional power under the [[Constitution_of_the_United_States#Commerce|commerce clause]]? | ||
|rule=The fundamental principle is that the power to regulate commerce is the power to enact all appropriate legislation for its protection or advancement to adopt measures to promote its growth and ensure its safety; to foster, protect, control, and restrain. | |rule=The fundamental principle is that the power to regulate commerce is the power to enact all appropriate legislation for its protection or advancement to adopt measures to promote its growth and ensure its safety; to foster, protect, control, and restrain. | ||
}} | }} |