Editing NIPSCO v. Carbon County

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 26: Line 26:
|holding=# No. Monetary loss resulting from economic risk-taking doesn't constitute a ''force majeure'' or satisfy either the doctrines of frustration or impossibility.
|holding=# No. Monetary loss resulting from economic risk-taking doesn't constitute a ''force majeure'' or satisfy either the doctrines of frustration or impossibility.
# No. The doctrine of illegality doesn't automatically void a contract.
# No. The doctrine of illegality doesn't automatically void a contract.
|judgment=Affirmed
|reasons=[[Richard A. Posner]]: The Indiana commission's authorization of the fuel surcharge didn't constitute a ''force majeure'' excusing NIPSCO's performance.
|reasons=[[Richard A. Posner]]: The Indiana commission's authorization of the fuel surcharge didn't constitute a ''force majeure'' excusing NIPSCO's performance.


Please note that all contributions to Wiki Law School are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (see Wiki Law School:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)