Wiki Law School will soon be moving! Please update your bookmarks. Our future address is www.wikilawschool.org |
Editing NIPSCO v. Carbon County
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
|holding=# No. Monetary loss resulting from economic risk-taking doesn't constitute a ''force majeure'' or satisfy either the doctrines of frustration or impossibility. | |holding=# No. Monetary loss resulting from economic risk-taking doesn't constitute a ''force majeure'' or satisfy either the doctrines of frustration or impossibility. | ||
# No. The doctrine of illegality doesn't automatically void a contract. | # No. The doctrine of illegality doesn't automatically void a contract. | ||
|reasons=[[Richard A. Posner]]: The Indiana commission's authorization of the fuel surcharge didn't constitute a ''force majeure'' excusing NIPSCO's performance. | |reasons=[[Richard A. Posner]]: The Indiana commission's authorization of the fuel surcharge didn't constitute a ''force majeure'' excusing NIPSCO's performance. | ||