Morris v. Mack's Used Cars: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court=Supreme Court of Tennessee |citation=824 S.W.2d 538 (1992) |date=1992 |subject=Contracts }} '''Holding''' Claims under the U.C.C. and the Consum...") |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 00:39, February 3, 2020
| Morris v. Mack's Used Cars | |
| Court | Supreme Court of Tennessee |
|---|---|
| Citation | 824 S.W.2d 538 (1992) |
| Date decided | 1992 |
Holding
Claims under the U.C.C. and the Consumer Protection Act are distinct causes of action, with different components and defenses, and disclaimers do not defeat separate causes of action for unfair or deceptive acts or practices.
