 |
Wiki Law School will soon be moving! Please update your bookmarks. Our future address is www.wikilawschool.org |
Minneapolis v. Columbus: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox Case Brief | {{Infobox Case Brief | ||
|court=Supreme Court of the United States | |court=Supreme Court of the United States | ||
|citation=119 U.S. 149 | |||
|date=November 29, 1886 | |date=November 29, 1886 | ||
|subject=Contracts | |subject=Contracts | ||
|other_subjects=Business Associations | |||
|facts=*Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. = "Minneapolis" = plaintiff = a train company based in Minnesota = a company needing iron for its railways = iron buyer | |facts=*Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. = "Minneapolis" = plaintiff = a train company based in Minnesota = a company needing iron for its railways = iron buyer | ||
*Columbus Rolling-Mill Co. = "Columbus" = defendant = an iron manufacturer = iron seller | *Columbus Rolling-Mill Co. = "Columbus" = defendant = an iron manufacturer = iron seller | ||
| Line 13: | Line 15: | ||
|procedural_history=* Minneapolis sued Columbus in federal district court. | |procedural_history=* Minneapolis sued Columbus in federal district court. | ||
* Minneapolis sought to enforce a December 19th 1879 contract for 2,000 tons of iron rails at $54/ton. | * Minneapolis sought to enforce a December 19th 1879 contract for 2,000 tons of iron rails at $54/ton. | ||
|arguments=Columbus contended that there was no contract. | |||
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | ||
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/minneapolis-amp-st-louis-railway-co-v-columbus-rolling-mill-co | |link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/minneapolis-amp-st-louis-railway-co-v-columbus-rolling-mill-co | ||
Revision as of 19:30, December 10, 2023
| Minneapolis v. Columbus | |
| Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
|---|---|
| Citation | 119 U.S. 149 |
| Date decided | November 29, 1886 |
Facts
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. = "Minneapolis" = plaintiff = a train company based in Minnesota = a company needing iron for its railways = iron buyer
- Columbus Rolling-Mill Co. = "Columbus" = defendant = an iron manufacturer = iron seller
- On December 5, 1879, Minneapolis wrote a letter to Columbus requesting a quote for the price of 2,000 to 5,000 tons of iron rails.
- Columbus offered to sell irons to Minneapolis for $54/ton if such large quantity was needed.
- Subsequently, Columbus became un-responsive to several letters from the buyer Minneapolis.
- Finally, on January 19th 1880, Columbus announced that there was no contract.
Procedural History
- Minneapolis sued Columbus in federal district court.
- Minneapolis sought to enforce a December 19th 1879 contract for 2,000 tons of iron rails at $54/ton.
Arguments
Columbus contended that there was no contract.
Resources
