Editing McCulloch v. Maryland
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
#** Note: This part of the opinion gave a wide scope to the [[Constitution_of_the_United_States#2_.28Supremacy_Clause.29|Supremacy Clause]]. A state law is void if it retards, impedes, burdens or otherwise interferes with the accomplishment of the congressional purpose in enacting the federal law. Unless the US government is supreme, it would be no better off than the weak government under the Articles of Confederation. | #** Note: This part of the opinion gave a wide scope to the [[Constitution_of_the_United_States#2_.28Supremacy_Clause.29|Supremacy Clause]]. A state law is void if it retards, impedes, burdens or otherwise interferes with the accomplishment of the congressional purpose in enacting the federal law. Unless the US government is supreme, it would be no better off than the weak government under the Articles of Confederation. | ||
|judgment=Reversed. | |judgment=Reversed. | ||
|comments=This case established the doctrine of implied powers and emphatically articulated the supremacy of the federal government. The opinion went far beyond the needs of the specific case to promote the power of the federal government. | |comments=This case established the doctrine of implied powers and emphatically articulated the supremacy of the federal government. The opinion went far beyond the needs of the specific case to promote the power of the federal government. | ||
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link |