Mathews v. Eldridge: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary
m (Text replacement - "|case_treatment=No " to "")
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
|date=February 24, 1976
|date=February 24, 1976
|subject=Administrative Law
|subject=Administrative Law
|case_treatment=No
|facts=Eldridge received [[Social Security]] disability benefits.
|facts=Eldridge received [[Social Security]] disability benefits.
|procedural_history=Eldridge files a federal lawsuit because his disability benefits were terminated without a hearing (due process).
|procedural_history=Eldridge (plaintiff) files a federal lawsuit because his disability benefits were terminated without a hearing (due process).
 
F. David Mathews (defendant) was the 11th US Secretary of Health and Human Services (1975 - 1977).
|issues=To act in accordance with the '''due process clause''', is an administrative hearing necessary prior to the termination of Social Security disability benefits?
|holding=The medical report showing that Eldridge is no longer disabled is sufficient for terminating his disability benefits; Eldridge's due process rights weren't violated in the absence of a termination hearing.
|rule=The [https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/mathews-test Mathews test] involves
|rule=The [https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/mathews-test Mathews test] involves
#the private interest affected by the official action;
#the <span style="background:yellow">private interest</span> affected by the official action;
#the risk of erroneous deprivation  
#the risk of erroneous deprivation  
#the government’s interest.
#the <span style="background:yellow">government’s interest</span>.


This test is used when the US government deprives a person of (1) life, (2) liberty, or (3) property interest. It is the test of '''<span style="background:magenta">procedural</span> due process'''.
This test is used when the US government deprives a person of (1) life, (2) liberty, or (3) property interest. It is the test of '''<span style="background:magenta">procedural</span> due process'''.
|comments=*[[Section_1983_Litigation/Constitutional_Rights_Enforceable_Under_%C2%A7_1983#Eldridge_Balancing]]
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/mathews-v-eldridge
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/mathews-v-eldridge
|case_text_source=Quimbee video summary
|source_type=Video summary
|case_text_source=Quimbee
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/keyterms/mathews-test
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/keyterms/mathews-test

Latest revision as of 03:39, July 14, 2023

Mathews v. Eldridge
Court Supreme Court of the United States
Citation
Date decided February 24, 1976

Facts

Eldridge received Social Security disability benefits.

Procedural History

Eldridge (plaintiff) files a federal lawsuit because his disability benefits were terminated without a hearing (due process).

F. David Mathews (defendant) was the 11th US Secretary of Health and Human Services (1975 - 1977).

Issues

To act in accordance with the due process clause, is an administrative hearing necessary prior to the termination of Social Security disability benefits?

Holding

The medical report showing that Eldridge is no longer disabled is sufficient for terminating his disability benefits; Eldridge's due process rights weren't violated in the absence of a termination hearing.

Rule

The Mathews test involves

  1. the private interest affected by the official action;
  2. the risk of erroneous deprivation
  3. the government’s interest.
This test is used when the US government deprives a person of (1) life, (2) liberty, or (3) property interest. It is the test of procedural due process.

Comments

Resources