Marchiondo v. Scheck

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Revision as of 16:25, December 4, 2023 by DeRien (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Marchiondo v. Scheck
Court New Mexico Supreme Court
Citation 432 P.2d 405
Date decided October 2, 1967

Facts

  • Marchiondo = a real estate broker = plaintiff = offeree
  • Scheck = property seller = defendant = offeror
  • Seller (Scheck) agreed to pay Plaintiff (Marchiondo) a % to sell a house, with the offer open for 6 days.
  • On day 6, Scheck found another buyer & sold to him, while Marchiondo found a buyer that same day.
  • Scheck refused to pay a commission to Marchiondo.

Procedural History

  • Marchiondo sued Scheck in state court in New Mexico claiming breach of contract.
  • Marchiondo lost.

Issues

May an offeror revoke an offer for a unilateral contract if the offeree completes partial performance?

Can Defendant (Scheck) rescind the offer to Plaintiff (Marchiondo)?

Holding

No. Partial performance of a unilateral contract by the offeree results in a contract that requires full performance by the offeror (Scheck).


No. Plaintiff had partially performed, which left the unilateral offer open for a reasonable time.

Judgment

Reversed & remanded for the determination of partial performance

Reasons

Judge Wood: The broker's partial performance eliminates the principal's right to revoke the agency.


Marchiondo received the revocation of the offer after the broker found a buyer.

Rule

A unilateral offer must be left open for a reasonable time once offeree has begun performance.

Resources


Marchiondo v. Scheck, 78 N.M. 440 (1967).