MPEP 718: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary
 
m (Text replacement - "__TOC__" to "<div class="noautonum">__TOC__</div>")
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>{{MPEP Section|716|700|719}}</noinclude>
<noinclude>{{MPEP Section|716|700|719}}</noinclude>
==[[MPEP 718|718 Affidavit or Declaration to Disqualify Commonly Owned Patent as Prior Art, 37 CFR 1.130]]==  
==[[MPEP 718|718 Affidavit or Declaration to Disqualify Commonly Owned Patent as Prior Art, 37 CFR 1.130]]==  
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude>


37 CFR 1.130. Affidavit or declaration to disqualify
<noinclude><div class="noautonum">__TOC__</div></noinclude>
commonly owned patent or published application as prior
art.


(a)When any claim of an application or a patent under reexamination  
{{Statute|37 CFR 1.130. Affidavit or declaration to disqualify commonly owned patent or published application as prior art.}}
(a) When any claim of an application or a patent under reexamination  
is rejected under 35  
is rejected under 35  
U.S.C. 103 on a U.S. patent or U.S.  
U.S.C. 103 on a U.S. patent or U.S.  
Line 20: Line 19:
prior art by submission of:
prior art by submission of:


(1)A terminal disclaimer in accordance with § 1.321(c);  
{{tab1}}(1)A terminal disclaimer in accordance with § 1.321(c); and</p>
and


(2)An oath or declaration stating that the application or  
{{tab1}}(2)An oath or declaration stating that the application or patent under reexamination and patent or published application are currently owned by the same party, and that the inventor named in the application or patent under reexamination is the prior inventor under 35 U.S.C. 104.</p>
patent under reexamination and patent or published application  
are currently owned by the same party, and that the inventor  
named in the application or patent under reexamination is the  
prior inventor under 35 U.S.C. 104.


(b)[Reserved]
(b)[Reserved]
|}


See MPEP § 804.03 and § 706.02(l) through  
See MPEP § 804.03 and § 706.02(l) through  
Line 41: Line 37:
which the rejection in an application or patent under  
which the rejection in an application or patent under  
reexamination to be overcome is a rejection under  
reexamination to be overcome is a rejection under  
35  
35 U.S.C. 103 in view of a U.S. patent or U.S. patent  
U.S.C. 103 in view of a U.S. patent or U.S. patent  
application publication due to the requirement in  
application publication due to the requirement in  
37 CFR 1.131 that any U.S. patent or U.S. patent  
37 CFR 1.131 that any U.S. patent or U.S. patent  
Line 56: Line 51:
owned.  
owned.  


As 37 CFR 1.130(a) addresses those situations in  
As 37 CFR 1.130(a) addresses those situations in  
which the inventions defined by the claims in the  
which the inventions defined by the claims in the  
application or patent under reexamination and by the  
application or patent under reexamination and by the  
Line 80: Line 75:
may not:
may not:


(A)establish a date of invention in a foreign  
{{tab1}}(A)establish a date of invention in a foreign country other than a NAFTA or WTO member country;</p>
country other than a NAFTA or WTO member country;  


(B)establish a date of invention in a WTO member  
{{tab1}}(B)establish a date of invention in a WTO member country other than a NAFTA country earlier than January 1, 1996; or</p>
country other than a NAFTA country earlier than  
January 1, 1996; or  


(C)establish a date of invention in a NAFTA  
{{tab1}}(C)establish a date of invention in a NAFTA country other than the U.S. earlier than December 8, 1993.</p>
country other than the U.S. earlier than December 8,  
1993.


A U.S. patent or U.S. patent application publication  
A U.S. patent or U.S. patent application publication  
that anticipates the claimed subject matter cannot be  
that anticipates the claimed subject matter cannot be  
disqualified as prior art under 35 U.S.C. 103(c) or  
disqualified as prior art under 35 U.S.C. 103(c) or  
37  
37 CFR 1.130 or 1.131.
CFR 1.130 or 1.131.

Latest revision as of 22:50, May 31, 2020

← MPEP 716 ↑ MPEP 700 MPEP 719 →


718 Affidavit or Declaration to Disqualify Commonly Owned Patent as Prior Art, 37 CFR 1.130[edit | edit source]

37 CFR 1.130. Affidavit or declaration to disqualify commonly owned patent or published application as prior art.

(a) When any claim of an application or a patent under reexamination is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 on a U.S. patent or U.S. patent application publication which is not prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(b), and the inventions defined by the claims in the application or patent under reexamination and by the claims in the patent or published application are not identical but are not patentably distinct, and the inventions are owned by the same party, the applicant or owner of the patent under reexamination may disqualify the patent or patent application publication as prior art. The patent or patent application publication can be disqualified as prior art by submission of:

(1)A terminal disclaimer in accordance with § 1.321(c); and

(2)An oath or declaration stating that the application or patent under reexamination and patent or published application are currently owned by the same party, and that the inventor named in the application or patent under reexamination is the prior inventor under 35 U.S.C. 104.

(b)[Reserved]


See MPEP § 804.03 and § 706.02(l) through § 706.02(l)(3) for subject matter disqualified as prior art under 35 U.S.C. 103(c) where the subject matter and the claimed invention were, at the time the invention was made, owned by the same person or subject to an obligation of assignment to the same person.

37 CFR 1.130(a) addresses those situations in which the rejection in an application or patent under reexamination to be overcome is a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 103 in view of a U.S. patent or U.S. patent application publication due to the requirement in 37 CFR 1.131 that any U.S. patent or U.S. patent application publication to be antedated not claim the same patentable invention (as defined in 37 CFR 41.203(a)) as the application or patent under reexamination. The applicant or patent owner is also prevented from proceeding in an interference due to the provision in 37 CFR 41.206 that an interference will not normally be declared or continued between applications that are commonly owned, or an application and an unexpired patent that are commonly owned.

As 37 CFR 1.130(a) addresses those situations in which the inventions defined by the claims in the application or patent under reexamination and by the claims in the U.S. patent or patent application publication are not patentably distinct, 37 CFR 1.130(a)(1) requires a terminal disclaimer in accordance with 37 CFR 1.321(c), and 37 CFR 1.130(a)(2) requires an oath or declaration stating, inter alia, that the inventor named in the application or patent under reexamination is the prior inventor under 35 U.S.C. 104. The inventor named in the application or patent under reexamination must have invented the claimed subject matter before the actual date of invention of the subject matter of the reference claims. The affidavit or declaration may be signed by the inventor(s), the attorney or agent of record, or assignee(s) of the entire interest.

The phrase “prior inventor under 35 U.S.C. 104” requires that the inventor named in the application or patent be the prior inventor within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 104, in that an applicant or patent owner may not:

(A)establish a date of invention in a foreign country other than a NAFTA or WTO member country;

(B)establish a date of invention in a WTO member country other than a NAFTA country earlier than January 1, 1996; or

(C)establish a date of invention in a NAFTA country other than the U.S. earlier than December 8, 1993.

A U.S. patent or U.S. patent application publication that anticipates the claimed subject matter cannot be disqualified as prior art under 35 U.S.C. 103(c) or 37 CFR 1.130 or 1.131.