Information for "MPEP 2185"
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
| Display title | MPEP 2185 |
| Default sort key | MPEP 2185 |
| Page length (in bytes) | 2,193 |
| Page ID | 1811 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
View the protection log for this page.
| Page creator | Lost Student (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 01:16, May 29, 2007 |
| Latest editor | Lost Student (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 22:53, May 31, 2020 |
| Total number of edits | 2 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
| Transcluded templates (2) | Templates used on this page:
|
| Page transcluded on (1) | Template used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Interpretation of claims as set forth in MPEP
§ 2181 may create some uncertainty as to what applicant
regards as the invention. If this issue arises, it
should be addressed in a rejection under 35 U.S.C.
112, second paragraph. While 35
U.S.C. 112, sixth
paragraph, permits a particular form of claim limitation,
it cannot be read as creating an exception either
to the description, enablement or best mode requirements
of the first paragraph or the definiteness
requirement of the second paragraph of 35 U.S.C.
112. In re Knowlton, 481 F.2d 1357, 178 USPQ 486
(CCPA 1973). |
Information from
Extension:WikiSEO
