Wiki Law School will soon be moving! Please update your bookmarks. Our future address is www.wikilawschool.org |
MPEP 2127: Difference between revisions
Lost Student (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Lost Student (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> | <noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> | ||
I.ABANDONED APPLICATIONS, | ======I. ABANDONED APPLICATIONS, INCLUDING PROVISIONAL APPLICATIONS====== | ||
Abandoned Applications Disclosed to the Public | '''Abandoned Applications Disclosed to the Public Can Be Used as Prior Art''' | ||
Can Be Used as Prior Art | |||
An abandoned patent application may become evidence | |||
of prior art only when it has been appropriately | of prior art only when it has been appropriately | ||
disclosed, as, for example, when the abandoned patent | disclosed, as, for example, when the abandoned patent | ||
application is referenced in the disclosure of | |||
another patent, in a publication, or by voluntary disclosure | another patent, in a publication, or by voluntary disclosure | ||
An abandoned patent application becomes | |||
available as prior art only as of the date the public | available as prior art only as of the date the public | ||
gains access to it. | gains access to it. However, the subject matter of an abandoned application, | ||
However, the subject matter of an abandoned application, | |||
including both provisional and nonprovisional | including both provisional and nonprovisional | ||
applications, referred to in a prior art U.S. patent may | applications, referred to in a prior art U.S. patent may | ||
Line 30: | Line 23: | ||
that patent if the disclosure of the abandoned application | that patent if the disclosure of the abandoned application | ||
is actually included or incorporated by reference | is actually included or incorporated by reference | ||
in the patent. | in the patent. | ||
See [[MPEP_2136#2136.02_Content_of_the_Prior_Art_Available_Against_the_Claims|MPEP § 2136.02]] and [[MPEP_2136#2136.03_Critical_Reference_Date|§ 2136.03]] for the 35 U.S.C. 102(e) date of a U.S. patent claiming priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 or 120. | |||
======II. APPLICATIONS WHICH HAVE ISSUED AS PATENTS====== | |||
'''A 35 U.S.C. 102(e) Rejection Cannot Rely on Matter Which Was Canceled from the Application and Thus Did Not Get Published in the Issued Patent''' | |||
Canceled matter in the application file of a U.S. patent cannot be relied upon in a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(e). The canceled matter only becomes available as prior art as of the date the application issues into a patent since this is the date the application file history becomes available to the public. | |||
For more information on available prior art for use in 35 U.S.C. 102(e) rejections see [[MPEP_2136#2136.02_Content_of_the_Prior_Art_Available_Against_the_Claims|MPEP § 2136.02]]. | |||
'''A 102(b) Rejection Over a Published Application May Rely on Information that Was Canceled Prior to Publication | |||
''' | |||
Figures that had been canceled from a Canadian patent application before issuance of the patent were available as prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as of the date the application became publicly accessible. [[Bruckelmyer v. Ground Heaters, Inc.]], 445 F.3d 1374, 78 USPQ2d 1684 (Fed. Cir. 2006). | |||
======III. FOREIGN APPLICATIONS OPEN FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION (LAID OPEN APPLICATIONS)====== | |||
Laid Open Applications May Constitute “Published” | '''Laid Open Applications May Constitute “Published” Documents''' | ||
Documents | |||
When the specification is not issued in printed form | When the specification is not issued in printed form | ||
Line 101: | Line 48: | ||
inspect or obtain copies, it is sufficiently accessible to | inspect or obtain copies, it is sufficiently accessible to | ||
the public to constitute a “publication” within the | the public to constitute a “publication” within the | ||
meaning of 35 U.S.C. 102(a) and (b | meaning of 35 U.S.C. 102(a) and (b). | ||
Older cases have held that laid open patent applications | Older cases have held that laid open patent applications | ||
are not “published” and cannot constitute prior | are not “published” and cannot constitute prior | ||
art. | art. However, whether or not a document is “published” | ||
However, whether or not a document is “published” | |||
for the purposes of 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 depends on | for the purposes of 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 depends on | ||
how accessible the document is to the public. As technology | how accessible the document is to the public. As technology | ||
Line 114: | Line 59: | ||
increased. Items provided in easily reproducible form | increased. Items provided in easily reproducible form | ||
have thus become “printed publications” as the phrase | have thus become “printed publications” as the phrase | ||
is used in 35 U.S.C. 102 | is used in 35 U.S.C. 102. | ||
IV.PENDING U.S. APPLICATIONS | ======IV. PENDING U.S. APPLICATIONS====== | ||
As specified in 37 CFR 1.14(a), all pending U.S. | As specified in 37 CFR 1.14(a), all pending U.S. | ||
Line 142: | Line 75: | ||
the two applications are not independent or distinct, a | the two applications are not independent or distinct, a | ||
provisional double patenting rejection is made. See | provisional double patenting rejection is made. See | ||
MPEP § 804. If the copending applications differ by | [[MPEP_800#804_Definition_of_Double_Patenting|MPEP § 804]]. If the copending applications differ by | ||
at least one inventor and at least one of the applications | at least one inventor and at least one of the applications | ||
would have been obvious in view of the other, a | would have been obvious in view of the other, a | ||
provisional rejection over 35 U.S.C. 102(e) or 103 is | provisional rejection over 35 U.S.C. 102(e) or 103 is | ||
made when appropriate. See MPEP § 706.02(f)(2), | made when appropriate. See [[MPEP_706#706.02.28f.29.282.29_Provisional_Rejections_Under35_U.S.C._102.28e.29.3B_Reference_Is_a_Copending_U.S._Patent_Application|MPEP § 706.02(f)(2)]], [[MPEP_706#706.02.28k.29_Provisional_Rejection_.28Obviousness.29_Under_35_U.S.C._102.28e.29.2F103|§ 706.02(k)]], [[MPEP_706#706.02.28l.29.281.29_Rejections_Under_35_U.S.C._103.28a.29_Using_Prior_Art_Under_35_U.S.C._102.28e.29.2C_.28f.29.2C_or_.28g.29.3B_Prior_Art_Disqualification_Under_35_U.S.C._103.28c.29|§ 706.02(l)(1)]], and [[MPEP_706#706.02.28l.29.283.29Examination_Procedure_With_Respect_to_35_U.S.C._103.28c.29|§ 706.02(l)(3)]]. | ||
§ | |||
706.02(k), § 706.02(l)(1), and § 706.02(l)(3). | |||
See MPEP § 706.02(a), § 804 and § 2136 et seq. for | See [[MPEP_706#706.02.28a.29Rejections_Under_35_U.S.C._102.28a.29.2C_.28b.29.2C_or_.28e.29.3B_Printed_Publication_or_Patent|MPEP § 706.02(a)]], [[MPEP_800#804_Definition_of_Double_Patenting|§ 804]] and [[MPEP_2136|§ 2136]] et seq. for | ||
information pertaining to rejections relying on U.S. | information pertaining to rejections relying on U.S. | ||
application publications. | application publications. | ||
<noinclude>{{MPEP Section|2126|2100|2128}}</noinclude> |
Revision as of 15:28, November 28, 2011
← MPEP 2126 | ↑ MPEP 2100 | MPEP 2128 → |
2127 Domestic and Foreign Patent Applications as Prior Art
I. ABANDONED APPLICATIONS, INCLUDING PROVISIONAL APPLICATIONS
Abandoned Applications Disclosed to the Public Can Be Used as Prior Art
An abandoned patent application may become evidence of prior art only when it has been appropriately disclosed, as, for example, when the abandoned patent application is referenced in the disclosure of another patent, in a publication, or by voluntary disclosure
An abandoned patent application becomes available as prior art only as of the date the public gains access to it. However, the subject matter of an abandoned application, including both provisional and nonprovisional applications, referred to in a prior art U.S. patent may be relied on in a 35 U.S.C. 102(e) rejection based on that patent if the disclosure of the abandoned application is actually included or incorporated by reference in the patent.
See MPEP § 2136.02 and § 2136.03 for the 35 U.S.C. 102(e) date of a U.S. patent claiming priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 or 120.
II. APPLICATIONS WHICH HAVE ISSUED AS PATENTS
A 35 U.S.C. 102(e) Rejection Cannot Rely on Matter Which Was Canceled from the Application and Thus Did Not Get Published in the Issued Patent
Canceled matter in the application file of a U.S. patent cannot be relied upon in a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(e). The canceled matter only becomes available as prior art as of the date the application issues into a patent since this is the date the application file history becomes available to the public.
For more information on available prior art for use in 35 U.S.C. 102(e) rejections see MPEP § 2136.02.
A 102(b) Rejection Over a Published Application May Rely on Information that Was Canceled Prior to Publication
Figures that had been canceled from a Canadian patent application before issuance of the patent were available as prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as of the date the application became publicly accessible. Bruckelmyer v. Ground Heaters, Inc., 445 F.3d 1374, 78 USPQ2d 1684 (Fed. Cir. 2006).
III. FOREIGN APPLICATIONS OPEN FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION (LAID OPEN APPLICATIONS)
Laid Open Applications May Constitute “Published” Documents
When the specification is not issued in printed form but is announced in an official journal and anyone can inspect or obtain copies, it is sufficiently accessible to the public to constitute a “publication” within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 102(a) and (b).
Older cases have held that laid open patent applications are not “published” and cannot constitute prior art. However, whether or not a document is “published” for the purposes of 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 depends on how accessible the document is to the public. As technology has made reproduction of documents easier, the accessibility of the laid open applications has increased. Items provided in easily reproducible form have thus become “printed publications” as the phrase is used in 35 U.S.C. 102.
IV. PENDING U.S. APPLICATIONS
As specified in 37 CFR 1.14(a), all pending U.S. applications are preserved in confidence except for published applications, reissue applications, and applications in which a request to open the complete application to inspection by the public has been granted by the Office (37 CFR 1.11(b)). However, if an application that has not been published has an assignee or inventor in common with the application being examined, a rejection will be proper in some circumstances. For instance, when the claims between the two applications are not independent or distinct, a provisional double patenting rejection is made. See MPEP § 804. If the copending applications differ by at least one inventor and at least one of the applications would have been obvious in view of the other, a provisional rejection over 35 U.S.C. 102(e) or 103 is made when appropriate. See MPEP § 706.02(f)(2), § 706.02(k), § 706.02(l)(1), and § 706.02(l)(3).
See MPEP § 706.02(a), § 804 and § 2136 et seq. for information pertaining to rejections relying on U.S. application publications.
← MPEP 2126 | ↑ MPEP 2100 | MPEP 2128 → |