Editing MPEP 1400
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 6,542: | Line 6,542: | ||
of making amendments to the drawings in a reissue | of making amendments to the drawings in a reissue | ||
application. | application. | ||
Form paragraph 14.20.01 may be used to advise | |||
applicant of the proper manner of making amendments | |||
in a reissue application. | |||
¶ 14.20.01 Amendments To Reissue-37 CFR 1.173(b) | |||
Applicant is notified that any subsequent amendment to the | |||
specification and/or claims must comply with 37 CFR 1.173(b). | |||
In addition, when any substantive amendment is filed in the reissue | |||
application, which amendment otherwise places the reissue | |||
application in condition for allowance, a supplemental oath/declaration | |||
will be required. See MPEP § 1414.01. | |||
Examiner Note: | |||
This form paragraph may be used in the first Office action to | |||
advise applicant of the proper manner of making amendments, | |||
and to notify applicant of the need to file a supplemental oath/declaration | |||
before the application can be allowed. | |||
Form paragraph 14.21.01 may be used to notify | |||
applicant that proposed amendments filed prior to | |||
final rejection in the reissue application do not comply | |||
with 37 CFR 1.173(b). | |||
¶ 14.21.01 Improper Amendment To Reissue - 37 CFR | |||
1.173(b) | |||
The amendment filed [1] proposes amendments to [2] that do | |||
not comply with 37 CFR 1.173(b), which sets forth the manner of | |||
making amendments in reissue applications. A supplemental | |||
paper correctly amending the reissue application is required. | |||
A shortened statutory period for reply to this letter is set to | |||
expire ONE MONTH or THIRTY DAYS, whichever is longer, | |||
from the mailing date of this letter. | |||
Examiner Note: | |||
1.This form paragraph may be used for any 37 CFR 1.173(b) | |||
informality as to an amendment submitted in a reissue application | |||
prior to final rejection. After final rejection, applicant should be | |||
informed that the amendment will not be entered by way of an | |||
Advisory Office action. | |||
2.In bracket 2, specify the proposed amendments that are not in | |||
compliance. | |||
Note that if an informal amendment is submitted | |||
after final rejection, form paragraph 14.21.01 should | |||
not be used. Rather, an advisory Office action should | |||
be issued using Form PTO-303 indicating that the | |||
amendment was not entered because it does not comply | |||
with 37 CFR 1.173(b), which sets forth the manner | |||
of making amendments in reissue applications. | |||
IV.ALL CHANGES ARE MADE VIS-À-VISTHE PATENT TO BE REISSUED | IV.ALL CHANGES ARE MADE VIS-À-VISTHE PATENT TO BE REISSUED | ||
Line 6,603: | Line 6,668: | ||
Amended | Amended | ||
Example (1) | |||
If it is desired to change the specification at column | If it is desired to change the specification at column | ||
Line 6,612: | Line 6,677: | ||
e.g., | e.g., | ||
Replace the paragraph beginning at column 4, line 23 | |||
with the following: | with the following: | ||
Scanning [is] are controlled by clocks which are, in turn, | |||
controlled from the display tube line synchronization. The | controlled from the display tube line synchronization. The | ||
signals resulting from scanning the scope of the character | signals resulting from scanning the scope of the character | ||
Line 6,621: | Line 6,686: | ||
through a shift register wherein the shift signal frequency is | through a shift register wherein the shift signal frequency is | ||
controlled by a clock that is, in turn, controlled from the display | controlled by a clock that is, in turn, controlled from the display | ||
tube line synchronization. | tube line synchronization. | ||
Example (2) | |||
For changes to the claims, one must submit a copy | For changes to the claims, one must submit a copy | ||
Line 6,629: | Line 6,694: | ||
shown by underlining and bracketing, e.g., | shown by underlining and bracketing, e.g., | ||
Amend claim 6 as follows: | |||
Claim 6 (Amended). The apparatus of claim [5] 1 wherein | |||
the [first] | the [first] second piezoelectric element is parallel to the | ||
[second] | [second] third piezoelectric element. | ||
If the dependency of any original patent claim is to | If the dependency of any original patent claim is to | ||
Line 6,642: | Line 6,707: | ||
B.Cancellation of Claim(s) | B.Cancellation of Claim(s) | ||
Example (3) | |||
To cancel an original patent claim, in writing, | To cancel an original patent claim, in writing, | ||
direct cancellation of the patent claim, e.g., | direct cancellation of the patent claim, e.g., | ||
Cancel claim 6. | |||
Example (4) | |||
To cancel a new claim (previously added in the | To cancel a new claim (previously added in the | ||
Line 6,655: | Line 6,725: | ||
claim, e.g., | claim, e.g., | ||
Cancel claim 15. | |||
C.Presentation of New Claims | C.Presentation of New Claims | ||
Example (5) | |||
Each new claim (i.e., a claim not found in the | Each new claim (i.e., a claim not found in the | ||
Line 6,666: | Line 6,736: | ||
throughout the claim, e.g., | throughout the claim, e.g., | ||
Add claim 7 as follows: | |||
Claim 7. The apparatus of claim 5 further comprising | |||
electrodes attaching to said opposite faces of the first and | electrodes attaching to said opposite faces of the first and | ||
second piezoelectric elements. | second piezoelectric elements. | ||
Even though original claims may have been canceled, | Even though original claims may have been canceled, | ||
Line 6,702: | Line 6,772: | ||
any indication of | any indication of | ||
what is changed from the previous | what is changed from the previous | ||
version of the claim, applicant must point out what is | version of the claim, | ||
applicant must point out what is | |||
changed in the “Remarks” portion of the amendment. | changed in the “Remarks” portion of the amendment. | ||
Also, per 37 CFR 1.173(c), each change made in the | Also, per 37 CFR 1.173(c), each change made in the | ||
Line 6,714: | Line 6,786: | ||
of original patent claims in reissue applications: | of original patent claims in reissue applications: | ||
A. Patent claim. | A. Patent claim. | ||
Claim 1. A cutting means having a handle portion | |||
and a blade portion. | |||
B. Proper first amendment format. | |||
Claim 1 (Amended). A [cutting means] knife having | |||
a bone handle portion and a notched blade portion. | |||
C. Proper second amendment format. | C. Proper second amendment format. | ||
Claim 1 (Twice Amended). A [cutting means] | |||
knife having a handle portion and a serrated blade | |||
portion. | portion. | ||
Note that the second amendment must include the | Note that the second amendment must include the | ||
changes previously presented in the first amendment, | changes previously presented in the first amendment, | ||
i.e., [cutting means] | i.e., [cutting means] knife, as well as the new changes | ||
presented in the second amendment, i.e., | presented in the second amendment, i.e., serrated. | ||
The word | The word bone was presented in the first amendment | ||
and is now to be deleted in the second amendment. | and is now to be deleted in the second amendment. | ||
The word | The word “bone” is NOT to be shown in | ||
brackets in the second amendment. Rather, the word | brackets in the second amendment. Rather, the word | ||
“bone” is simply omitted from the claim, since “bone” | |||
never appeared in the patent. An explanation of the | never appeared in the patent. An explanation of the | ||
deletion should appear in the remarks. | deletion should appear in the remarks. | ||
The word | The word notched which was presented in the first | ||
amendment is replaced by the word serrated in the | amendment is replaced by the word serrated in the | ||
second amendment. The word | second amendment. The word notched is being | ||
deleted in the second amendment and did not appear | deleted in the second amendment and did not appear | ||
in the patent; accordingly, | in the patent; accordingly, “notched” is not shown in | ||
any form in the claim. The word | any form in the claim. The word serrated is being | ||
added in the second amendment, and accordingly | added in the second amendment, and accordingly | ||
“serrated” is added to the claim and is underlined. | |||
In the second amendment, the deletions of | In the second amendment, the deletions of | ||
“notched” and “bone” are not changes from the original | |||
patent claim text and therefore are not shown in | patent claim text and therefore are not shown in | ||
brackets in the second amendment. In both the first | brackets in the second amendment. In both the first | ||
and the second amendments, the entire claim is presented | and the second amendments, the entire claim is presented | ||
only with the changes from the | only with the changes from the original patent | ||
text | text. | ||
VI.ADDITIONAL EXAMPLES | VI.ADDITIONAL EXAMPLES | ||
Line 6,767: | Line 6,840: | ||
As per MPEP § 1411, double underlining and | As per MPEP § 1411, double underlining and | ||
double bracketing are used in the second reissue | double bracketing are used in the second reissue | ||
application to show amendments made relative to the | application to show amendments made relative to the | ||
first reissued patent | first reissued patent |